Comparing Scots pine regeneration established by sowing and planting at various times of year

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
W. Barzdajn, W. Kowalkowski, Robert Tomczak
{"title":"Comparing Scots pine regeneration established by sowing and planting at various times of year","authors":"W. Barzdajn, W. Kowalkowski, Robert Tomczak","doi":"10.2478/frp-2019-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the practical feasibility of two forest regeneration methods using Scots pine Pinus sylvestris L. To this end, comparative experiments were established in the Złotoryja and Legnica Forest Districts. The site in Złotoryja had been clear cut, while the experimental plot in Legnica was established at a location damaged by wind in 2009 and cleared from wind throws and wind-broken trees before the experiment. Four different dates for sowing and two for planting were chosen in order to investigate the potential forest regeneration with respect to time. Both experiments were established according to the same design: a complete random block design with five replication blocks. To each plot we applied approximately 53 g (1.2 kg/ha) of seeds and planted 230 seedlings (10 200 seedlings/ha). In 2017, the height of the pine trees was recorded and their increment in height was measured in 2016 as well as 2017. A preliminary analysis of results was conducted using ANOVA for multiple experiments in order to identify significant differences and to then combine variables to form homogeneous groups to which the Duncan multiple range test could be applied. For growth traits, the ANOVA showed significant differences between experimental sights as well as a significant interaction of factors with the experimental site. In terms of planting, April was the most advantageous resulting in the greatest tree height in both forest districts, while in the Legnica Forest District the saplings planted in April also showed the greatest annual increments. Among the sowing dates, the most advantageous was the winter sowing, while the April sowing date produced the least desirable results. In conclusion, both sowing and planting are effective methods to establish pine cultures in coniferous forest. Furthermore, both methods may be performed at the currently recommended spring date, but they may also be postponed to summer and winter dates provided favorable weather conditions prevail.","PeriodicalId":35347,"journal":{"name":"USDA Forest Service - Research Papers PNW-RP","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"USDA Forest Service - Research Papers PNW-RP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/frp-2019-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the practical feasibility of two forest regeneration methods using Scots pine Pinus sylvestris L. To this end, comparative experiments were established in the Złotoryja and Legnica Forest Districts. The site in Złotoryja had been clear cut, while the experimental plot in Legnica was established at a location damaged by wind in 2009 and cleared from wind throws and wind-broken trees before the experiment. Four different dates for sowing and two for planting were chosen in order to investigate the potential forest regeneration with respect to time. Both experiments were established according to the same design: a complete random block design with five replication blocks. To each plot we applied approximately 53 g (1.2 kg/ha) of seeds and planted 230 seedlings (10 200 seedlings/ha). In 2017, the height of the pine trees was recorded and their increment in height was measured in 2016 as well as 2017. A preliminary analysis of results was conducted using ANOVA for multiple experiments in order to identify significant differences and to then combine variables to form homogeneous groups to which the Duncan multiple range test could be applied. For growth traits, the ANOVA showed significant differences between experimental sights as well as a significant interaction of factors with the experimental site. In terms of planting, April was the most advantageous resulting in the greatest tree height in both forest districts, while in the Legnica Forest District the saplings planted in April also showed the greatest annual increments. Among the sowing dates, the most advantageous was the winter sowing, while the April sowing date produced the least desirable results. In conclusion, both sowing and planting are effective methods to establish pine cultures in coniferous forest. Furthermore, both methods may be performed at the currently recommended spring date, but they may also be postponed to summer and winter dates provided favorable weather conditions prevail.
比较一年中不同时期通过播种和种植建立的苏格兰松再生
摘要本研究旨在评价两种利用苏格兰松(Pinus sylvestris L.)进行森林更新的可行性,为此,在Złotoryja林区和Legnica林区建立了对比试验。Złotoryja的试验地已经被清理干净,而莱格尼卡的试验地是在2009年被风破坏的地方建立的,在实验之前已经清除了风扔物和被风吹断的树木。选择了4个不同的播种日期和2个不同的种植日期,以调查森林在时间方面的潜在更新。两个实验都按照相同的设计建立:一个完整的随机区设计,有五个复制区。在每个地块上,我们施用了大约53克(1.2公斤/公顷)的种子,并种植了230株幼苗(10 200株/公顷)。2017年记录了松树的高度,并在2016年和2017年测量了松树的高度增量。采用方差分析对多个实验的结果进行初步分析,以确定显著差异,然后将变量组合形成同质组,从而可以应用Duncan多元极差检验。对于生长性状,方差分析显示不同试验点之间存在显著差异,各因素与试验点之间存在显著的交互作用。在种植方面,4月是最有利的,两个林区的树高都是最大的,而在长叶花林,4月种植的树苗也表现出最大的年增长量。各播期中冬播最有利,4月播期效果最差。综上所述,播种和种植是针叶林松木培养的有效方法。此外,这两种方法都可以在目前推荐的春季进行,但如果天气条件有利,也可以推迟到夏季和冬季进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
USDA Forest Service - Research Papers PNW-RP
USDA Forest Service - Research Papers PNW-RP Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信