Why Rip Matters?

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Logos and Episteme Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5840/logos-episteme202112211

Filip Čukljević

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to reexamine the importance of Rip van Winkle’s case for the problem of cognitive dynamics. First I shall present the main problem of cognitive dynamics. Then I shall explain the relevance of Rip’s case to this problem. After that I shall provide a short presentation of the main solutions to this problem. I shall explicate the problem concerning the manner in which philosophers who propose those solutions defend their response to the question of Rip’s case. My argument shall be that they defend their response either in overly dogmatic or in circular way. Finally, I shall suggest a way out of that problem.

查看原文本刊更多论文

为什么撕裂很重要?

本文的目的是重新审视瑞普·凡·温克尔案例对认知动力学问题的重要性。首先，我将提出认知动力学的主要问题。然后我将解释里普的案例与这个问题的关联。之后，我将简要介绍这个问题的主要解决办法。我将解释提出这些解决方案的哲学家如何为他们对里普案例的回答辩护。我的观点是，他们为自己的回应辩护，要么过于教条，要么循环往复。最后，我将提出一个解决这个问题的方法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Logos and Episteme Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

20 weeks

期刊介绍： the journal publishes articles, reviews or discussion notes focused as well on problems concerning the general theory of knowledge, as on problems specific to the philosophy, methodology and ethics of science, philosophical logic, metaphilosophy, moral epistemology, epistemology of art, epistemology of religion, social or political epistemology, epistemology of communication. Studies in the history of science and of the philosophy of knowledge, or studies in the sociology of knowledge, cognitive psychology, and cognitive science are also welcome.