Comparative Assessment of Biodegradability Potential of Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on Oil Spill Dispersant (Aquabreak and Teepol) in Freshwater

Y. E. Mba, C. J. Ugboma, R. Nrior
{"title":"Comparative Assessment of Biodegradability Potential of Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on Oil Spill Dispersant (Aquabreak and Teepol) in Freshwater","authors":"Y. E. Mba, C. J. Ugboma, R. Nrior","doi":"10.9734/mrji/2023/v33i51381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To compare and assessment of Biodegradability Potential of Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on oil spill dispersant (Aquabreak and Teepol) in Freshwater. Fresh water sample were collected from Biara, Gokana L.G.A, and were transported to the Microbiology Laboratory of Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria for analyses while Oil spill dispersant (OSD/Aquabreak) was purchased from Barker and Hughes, all in Rivers state. Nine experimental set up were carried out using Bacillus and Pseudomonas species as the bio-augmenting organism. Controls were made without organisms. Its bioremediation potential on the pollutants and two types of test organisms  were monitored for 28 days at an interval of 7day period. The setup was aerated twice a week to provide more oxygen for the organisms to thrive. Analysis of samples were carried out using standard analytical procedures. The resultsphysiochemical property of the water shows that as follows: pH 6.5, Temperature 30.0 ºC,  Electric  conductivity 15 µs/cm, Total dissolved solid  7 mg/l ,Chlorine 0.1 mg/l, Bromine 0.2 mg/l, Salinity (0.01 mg/l), Dissolved oxygen 1.5 mg/l , Biological Oxygen Demand 0.3 mg/l, Nitrate 0.01 mg/l, Sulphate 4.18 mg/l Phosphate 0.10 to 1.5mg/l, Total Hydrocarbon content 24mg/l. Percentage (%) Ultimate biodegradability of the two oil spill dispersant OSD/teepol and OSD/aquabreak  revealed that control set-up recorded the 79.3 and 86.7 % , bioremediation set-up augmented with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens recorded 93.7 and 99.1% while the set-up augmented with P. putida had 98.0 and 94.7% respectively . It was observed  that P. putida degrade Teepol than Bacillus amyloliquefaciens while aquabreak is more degraded by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens than P. putida. Nevertheless both dispersant shown high level of degradability by the test organisms. Therefore It is recommended that oil companies and government parastatals carrying out remediation in the Niger Delta should be encouraged and OSD/Teepol and OSD/aqubreak due to their high biodegradation potential.","PeriodicalId":18450,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology Research Journal International","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology Research Journal International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/mrji/2023/v33i51381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To compare and assessment of Biodegradability Potential of Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on oil spill dispersant (Aquabreak and Teepol) in Freshwater. Fresh water sample were collected from Biara, Gokana L.G.A, and were transported to the Microbiology Laboratory of Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria for analyses while Oil spill dispersant (OSD/Aquabreak) was purchased from Barker and Hughes, all in Rivers state. Nine experimental set up were carried out using Bacillus and Pseudomonas species as the bio-augmenting organism. Controls were made without organisms. Its bioremediation potential on the pollutants and two types of test organisms  were monitored for 28 days at an interval of 7day period. The setup was aerated twice a week to provide more oxygen for the organisms to thrive. Analysis of samples were carried out using standard analytical procedures. The resultsphysiochemical property of the water shows that as follows: pH 6.5, Temperature 30.0 ºC,  Electric  conductivity 15 µs/cm, Total dissolved solid  7 mg/l ,Chlorine 0.1 mg/l, Bromine 0.2 mg/l, Salinity (0.01 mg/l), Dissolved oxygen 1.5 mg/l , Biological Oxygen Demand 0.3 mg/l, Nitrate 0.01 mg/l, Sulphate 4.18 mg/l Phosphate 0.10 to 1.5mg/l, Total Hydrocarbon content 24mg/l. Percentage (%) Ultimate biodegradability of the two oil spill dispersant OSD/teepol and OSD/aquabreak  revealed that control set-up recorded the 79.3 and 86.7 % , bioremediation set-up augmented with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens recorded 93.7 and 99.1% while the set-up augmented with P. putida had 98.0 and 94.7% respectively . It was observed  that P. putida degrade Teepol than Bacillus amyloliquefaciens while aquabreak is more degraded by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens than P. putida. Nevertheless both dispersant shown high level of degradability by the test organisms. Therefore It is recommended that oil companies and government parastatals carrying out remediation in the Niger Delta should be encouraged and OSD/Teepol and OSD/aqubreak due to their high biodegradation potential.
恶臭假单胞菌和解淀粉芽孢杆菌对淡水中溢油分散剂(aqubreak和Teepol)生物降解潜力的比较评价
比较和评价恶臭假单胞菌和解淀粉芽孢杆菌对淡水中溢油分散剂(aqubreak和Teepol)的生物降解潜力。淡水样本从Gokana L.G.A的Biara收集,并被运送到尼日利亚Harcourt港的Rivers State University微生物实验室进行分析,而原油分散剂(OSD/Aquabreak)则从位于Rivers State的Barker和Hughes购买。以芽孢杆菌和假单胞菌为增菌菌,建立了9个试验装置。在没有生物体的情况下进行对照。以7d为周期,连续28 d监测其对污染物和两种试验生物的生物修复潜力。这个装置每周充气两次,为微生物的生长提供更多的氧气。使用标准分析程序对样品进行分析。结果水的理化性质为:pH 6.5,温度30.0ºC,电导率15µs/cm,总溶解固体7 mg/l,氯0.1 mg/l,溴0.2 mg/l,盐度0.01 mg/l,溶解氧1.5mg/l,生物需氧量0.3 mg/l,硝酸盐0.01 mg/l,硫酸盐4.18 mg/l,磷酸盐0.10 ~ 1.5mg/l,总烃含量24mg/l。OSD/teepol和OSD/ aqubreak两种原油分散剂的最终生物降解率分别为79.3%和86.7%,与解淀粉芽孢杆菌增强的生物修复装置分别为93.7%和99.1%,与恶臭杆菌增强的生物修复装置分别为98.0%和94.7%。结果表明,腐殖芽孢杆菌对Teepol的降解效果优于解淀粉芽孢杆菌,而对aqubreak的降解效果优于腐殖芽孢杆菌。然而,两种分散剂均表现出较高的可降解性。因此,建议应鼓励石油公司和政府半国有企业在尼日尔三角洲进行修复,并鼓励OSD/Teepol和OSD/aqubreak,因为它们具有很高的生物降解潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信