Distinguishing Useful and Wasteful Slack

IF 0.7 4区 管理学 Q3 Engineering
P. Bogetoft, P. Kerstens
{"title":"Distinguishing Useful and Wasteful Slack","authors":"P. Bogetoft, P. Kerstens","doi":"10.1287/opre.2022.2415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Can inefficiency be rational? Excess resources or slack may serve as a buffer against environmental shocks, help decouple organizations, ease planning and implementation, support innovation, and enable effective responses to competitors. Slack may however also be the result of inefficiency. In Bogetoft and Kerstens, Distinguishing useful and wasteful slack, we propose an approach to separate useful and wasteful slack. If an organization can maintain the same levels of output and slack at lower cost, there is wasteful or nonrationalizable spending. We develop ways to measure the extent to which total spending can be rationalized and show how to statistically estimate and test the usefulness of the available slack using bootstrapping.","PeriodicalId":49809,"journal":{"name":"Military Operations Research","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Can inefficiency be rational? Excess resources or slack may serve as a buffer against environmental shocks, help decouple organizations, ease planning and implementation, support innovation, and enable effective responses to competitors. Slack may however also be the result of inefficiency. In Bogetoft and Kerstens, Distinguishing useful and wasteful slack, we propose an approach to separate useful and wasteful slack. If an organization can maintain the same levels of output and slack at lower cost, there is wasteful or nonrationalizable spending. We develop ways to measure the extent to which total spending can be rationalized and show how to statistically estimate and test the usefulness of the available slack using bootstrapping.
区分有用和浪费的懈怠
低效率是理性的吗?过剩的资源或懈怠可以作为对环境冲击的缓冲,帮助分离组织,简化计划和实施,支持创新,并使对竞争对手的有效反应成为可能。然而,懈怠也可能是效率低下的结果。在Bogetoft和Kerstens的《区分有用和浪费的松弛》中,我们提出了一种区分有用松弛和浪费松弛的方法。如果一个组织能够以较低的成本保持相同的产出水平,那么就存在浪费或不合理的支出。我们开发了一些方法来衡量总支出可以合理化的程度,并展示了如何使用自举来统计估计和测试可用闲置的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Military Operations Research
Military Operations Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Operations Research is a peer-reviewed journal of high academic quality. The Journal publishes articles that describe operations research (OR) methodologies and theories used in key military and national security applications. Of particular interest are papers that present: Case studies showing innovative OR applications Apply OR to major policy issues Introduce interesting new problems areas Highlight education issues Document the history of military and national security OR.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信