An European Perspective on Regulating Psychology: A review of the European Commission’s Mutual Evaluation of Regulated Professions

E. Karayianni
{"title":"An European Perspective on Regulating Psychology: A review of the European Commission’s Mutual Evaluation of Regulated Professions","authors":"E. Karayianni","doi":"10.15388/PSICHOL.2018.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian] \nThe article provides a summarized review of the current legal status of the profession of psychology across European countries, making a case for the need of a legal status and recognition of the profession. The review is based on comparing and contrasting the results of the European Commission’s mutual evaluation of the regulated professions report published in 2016 and the currently available information on the EU Single Market Regulated Professions Database maintained by the European Commission. Results show that, despite the different levels of qualifications required in the Member States, the general requirements tend to follow the Bologna process. The review also focuses on the rationale provided for regulation and the requirement for professional membership.","PeriodicalId":33049,"journal":{"name":"Psichologija","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psichologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/PSICHOL.2018.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

[full article, abstract in English; abstract in Lithuanian] The article provides a summarized review of the current legal status of the profession of psychology across European countries, making a case for the need of a legal status and recognition of the profession. The review is based on comparing and contrasting the results of the European Commission’s mutual evaluation of the regulated professions report published in 2016 and the currently available information on the EU Single Market Regulated Professions Database maintained by the European Commission. Results show that, despite the different levels of qualifications required in the Member States, the general requirements tend to follow the Bologna process. The review also focuses on the rationale provided for regulation and the requirement for professional membership.
监管心理学的欧洲视角:欧盟委员会对受监管职业的相互评价综述
[全文,英文摘要;这篇文章概述了欧洲各国心理学专业的法律地位,提出了一个法律地位和承认这一专业的必要性。该审查是基于比较和对比欧盟委员会对2016年发布的受监管职业报告的相互评估结果和欧盟委员会维护的欧盟单一市场受监管职业数据库的现有信息。结果表明,尽管会员国要求的资格等级不同,但一般要求往往遵循博洛尼亚进程。审查还侧重于为监管提供的理由和对专业成员的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信