Comparison of the short-term effects of tooth-bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion in older adolescents.

IF 1 4区 生物学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES
Botany Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-25 DOI:10.1007/s00056-022-00401-x
Mustafa Gokturk, Mehmet Ali Yavan
{"title":"Comparison of the short-term effects of tooth-bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion in older adolescents.","authors":"Mustafa Gokturk, Mehmet Ali Yavan","doi":"10.1007/s00056-022-00401-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the short-term effects of tooth-bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) devices on dentofacial structures in older adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study reviewed pre- and posttreatment lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric images and orthodontic model records of patients who underwent maxillary expansion. Two groups were formed, in which the same upper jaw expansion protocol was applied with two different maxillary expansion devices: the first group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth-bone-borne (hybrid) RME (HRME; 9 girls and 6 boys; mean age, 16.9 ± 0.42 years) and the second group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth-borne (conventional) RME (CRME; 8 girls and 7 boys; mean age, 16.74 ± 0.54 years). Cephalometric and orthodontic model measurements were conducted on the records taken before and after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant skeletal and dental expansions were observed in both groups (p < 0.05). However, the increase in nasal width measurements in the HRME group (2.24 ± 0.61 mm) was significantly higher than the increase in the CRME group (1.12 ± 0.25 mm; p < 0.01). Buccal tipping of the premolars was significantly less in the HRME group (0.46 ± 0.35°) than in the CRME group (2.46 ± 0.63°; p < 0.01). The amount of tipping of the molars was higher in the HRME group (4.76 ± 0.88°) compared to the CRME group (2.9 ± 1.03°; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the HRME device increase the nasal width in older adolescents to a greater extent, more dental side effects were seen at the maxillary first molars.</p>","PeriodicalId":9092,"journal":{"name":"Botany","volume":"53 1","pages":"43-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Botany","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-022-00401-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the short-term effects of tooth-bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion (RME) devices on dentofacial structures in older adolescents.

Methods: The retrospective study reviewed pre- and posttreatment lateral and posteroanterior cephalometric images and orthodontic model records of patients who underwent maxillary expansion. Two groups were formed, in which the same upper jaw expansion protocol was applied with two different maxillary expansion devices: the first group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth-bone-borne (hybrid) RME (HRME; 9 girls and 6 boys; mean age, 16.9 ± 0.42 years) and the second group consisted of 15 individuals treated with tooth-borne (conventional) RME (CRME; 8 girls and 7 boys; mean age, 16.74 ± 0.54 years). Cephalometric and orthodontic model measurements were conducted on the records taken before and after treatment.

Results: Significant skeletal and dental expansions were observed in both groups (p < 0.05). However, the increase in nasal width measurements in the HRME group (2.24 ± 0.61 mm) was significantly higher than the increase in the CRME group (1.12 ± 0.25 mm; p < 0.01). Buccal tipping of the premolars was significantly less in the HRME group (0.46 ± 0.35°) than in the CRME group (2.46 ± 0.63°; p < 0.01). The amount of tipping of the molars was higher in the HRME group (4.76 ± 0.88°) compared to the CRME group (2.9 ± 1.03°; p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Although the HRME device increase the nasal width in older adolescents to a greater extent, more dental side effects were seen at the maxillary first molars.

在年龄较大的青少年中比较牙骨性和牙源性快速上颌骨扩张的短期效果。
目的:比较牙骨性和牙源性快速上颌扩弓(RME)装置对老年青少年颌面结构的短期影响:这项回顾性研究回顾了接受上颌扩弓术的患者治疗前后的侧方和后正方头颅测量图像以及正畸模型记录。研究分为两组,采用相同的上颌扩弓方案和两种不同的上颌扩弓装置:第一组包括15名采用牙骨质(混合)RME(HRME;9名女孩和6名男孩;平均年龄(16.9 ± 0.42岁)治疗的患者;第二组包括15名采用牙骨质(传统)RME(CRME;8名女孩和7名男孩;平均年龄(16.74 ± 0.54岁)治疗的患者。对治疗前后的记录进行了头型测量和正畸模型测量:结果:两组患者的骨骼和牙齿都有明显的扩张(P虽然 HRME 装置在更大程度上增加了年龄较大的青少年的鼻腔宽度,但在上颌第一磨牙处发现了更多的牙齿副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Botany
Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Botany features comprehensive research articles and notes in all segments of plant sciences, including cell and molecular biology, ecology, mycology and plant-microbe interactions, phycology, physiology and biochemistry, structure and development, genetics, systematics, and phytogeography. It also publishes methods, commentary, and review articles on topics of current interest, contributed by internationally recognized scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信