Kirti Durelle on spaces of desertion and the historical architecture of class formation

IF 0.2 4区 艺术学 N/A ARCHITECTURE
K. Durelle
{"title":"Kirti Durelle on spaces of desertion and the historical architecture of class formation","authors":"K. Durelle","doi":"10.1017/s135913552200029x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Edited by three historians of varying seniority,1 A Global History of Runaways provides an overview of worker desertions in European imperial territories during the early modern period. Encompassing a range of worker types (slaves, indentured workers, wage workers, convicts and penal labourers, sailors and soldiers, domestic servants, and agricultural workers), the eleven essays outline the experiences and coercive labour conditions that compelled them to abscond from their circumscribed positions, and the effects of desertion on developing capitalist organisation. What is common to the various categories of workers represented in the volume is their labour power in the vast projects of European states’ imperial expansion, often via the East and West India Companies – corporations acting as the vehicles of early capitalist production and trade in the colonies [1]. The historical context of the essays is ‘the establishment of European empires and the rise of capitalism around the globe beginning in the sixteenth century’, two ‘entwined processes [that] created multiple labour regimes’.2 The Portuguese, Dutch, English, French, and Danish India Companies feature prominently as the dominant force in coercive labour relations, as do military and police institutions, local colonial governments, colonial planters, and slave owners. Though perhaps not immediately apparent, this web of colonial agents commanded a tremendous amount of labour power. Taking, for example, the Dutch East India Company (or VOC): Throughout its Eurasian empire, the VOC employed large numbers of sailors, soldiers and other workers engaged in construction, maintenance, warfare, control, and the production and transport and goods. At its height in the middle of the eighteenth century, the Company directly employed some 57,000 workers.3 Texts in this volume share a commitment to studying the historical agencies of these ‘...spatial relationships between escapees and the territories they were fleeing ...’","PeriodicalId":43799,"journal":{"name":"arq-Architectural Research Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arq-Architectural Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s135913552200029x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Edited by three historians of varying seniority,1 A Global History of Runaways provides an overview of worker desertions in European imperial territories during the early modern period. Encompassing a range of worker types (slaves, indentured workers, wage workers, convicts and penal labourers, sailors and soldiers, domestic servants, and agricultural workers), the eleven essays outline the experiences and coercive labour conditions that compelled them to abscond from their circumscribed positions, and the effects of desertion on developing capitalist organisation. What is common to the various categories of workers represented in the volume is their labour power in the vast projects of European states’ imperial expansion, often via the East and West India Companies – corporations acting as the vehicles of early capitalist production and trade in the colonies [1]. The historical context of the essays is ‘the establishment of European empires and the rise of capitalism around the globe beginning in the sixteenth century’, two ‘entwined processes [that] created multiple labour regimes’.2 The Portuguese, Dutch, English, French, and Danish India Companies feature prominently as the dominant force in coercive labour relations, as do military and police institutions, local colonial governments, colonial planters, and slave owners. Though perhaps not immediately apparent, this web of colonial agents commanded a tremendous amount of labour power. Taking, for example, the Dutch East India Company (or VOC): Throughout its Eurasian empire, the VOC employed large numbers of sailors, soldiers and other workers engaged in construction, maintenance, warfare, control, and the production and transport and goods. At its height in the middle of the eighteenth century, the Company directly employed some 57,000 workers.3 Texts in this volume share a commitment to studying the historical agencies of these ‘...spatial relationships between escapees and the territories they were fleeing ...’
Kirti Durelle关于遗弃空间和阶级形成的历史建筑
由三位不同资历的历史学家编辑,《全球逃亡史》提供了近代早期欧洲帝国领土上工人逃亡的概况。这十一篇文章涵盖了一系列的工人类型(奴隶、契约工人、工资工人、罪犯和劳役工人、水手和士兵、家仆和农业工人),概述了迫使他们从受限制的岗位上潜逃的经历和强制劳动条件,以及遗弃对发展资本主义组织的影响。本书中所代表的各类工人的共同点是他们在欧洲国家帝国扩张的庞大项目中的劳动力,通常是通过东印度公司和西印度公司——这些公司作为早期资本主义生产和殖民地贸易的工具[1]。论文的历史背景是“16世纪欧洲帝国的建立和资本主义在全球的兴起”,这两个“相互交织的过程创造了多种劳动制度”葡萄牙、荷兰、英国、法国和丹麦的印度公司,以及军事和警察机构、地方殖民政府、殖民种植园主和奴隶主,都是强制劳动关系中的主导力量。虽然可能不会立即显现出来,但这个殖民代理人网络掌握着大量的劳动力。以荷兰东印度公司(或VOC)为例:在整个欧亚帝国,VOC雇佣了大量的水手、士兵和其他工人从事建筑、维修、战争、控制、生产、运输和货物。在十八世纪中叶的鼎盛时期,公司直接雇用了大约五万七千名工人本卷中的文本都致力于研究这些“……逃亡者和他们逃离的领土之间的空间关系……”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Arq publishes cutting-edge work covering all aspects of architectural endeavour. Contents include building design, urbanism, history, theory, environmental design, construction, materials, information technology, and practice. Other features include interviews, occasional reports, lively letters pages, book reviews and an end feature, Insight. Reviews of significant buildings are published at length and in a detail matched today by few other architectural journals. Elegantly designed, inspirational and often provocative, arq is essential reading for practitioners in industry and consultancy as well as for academic researchers.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信