Physicians’ perception of the reform of the review and assessment system of national health insurance reimbursement claims

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jung Chan Lee, K. Kim
{"title":"Physicians’ perception of the reform of the review and assessment system of national health insurance reimbursement claims","authors":"Jung Chan Lee, K. Kim","doi":"10.5124/jkma.2022.65.12.841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Korean government has been promoting the reform of the review and assessment system of national health insurance reimbursement claims. The aim of this study was to find out physicians’ perception and evaluation of the health insurance review and assessment system and present the direction for the government’s reform plan.Methods: The 2020 Korean Physician Survey questionnaire was sent to 57,714 members of the Korean Medical Association from November 19, 2020 to January 10, 2021. A total of 6,507 physicians (11.5%) responded; of these, the responses of 4,454, including the self-employed and employed, professors, and fellows, were included for analysis. The respondents’ perception of the current health insurance review system and of the government’s reform plan were analyzed.Results: It was found that 84.2% of the respondents evaluated the current health insurance review system negatively—particularly in terms of medical autonomy, transparency of the review standards, the standard development and application process, and the post-review adjustment process. Furthermore, only 0.7% of the respondents evaluated the government’s reform plan positively—particularly, the utilization of clinical practice guidelines for review standards, introduction of the professional review committee, and expansion of the link between the review and assessment system.Conclusion: Policymakers should understand physicians’ perception and evaluation of the health insurance review system. In addition, the reform plan should be thoroughly communicated to physicians.","PeriodicalId":17300,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Korean Medical Association","volume":"2013 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Korean Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2022.65.12.841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Korean government has been promoting the reform of the review and assessment system of national health insurance reimbursement claims. The aim of this study was to find out physicians’ perception and evaluation of the health insurance review and assessment system and present the direction for the government’s reform plan.Methods: The 2020 Korean Physician Survey questionnaire was sent to 57,714 members of the Korean Medical Association from November 19, 2020 to January 10, 2021. A total of 6,507 physicians (11.5%) responded; of these, the responses of 4,454, including the self-employed and employed, professors, and fellows, were included for analysis. The respondents’ perception of the current health insurance review system and of the government’s reform plan were analyzed.Results: It was found that 84.2% of the respondents evaluated the current health insurance review system negatively—particularly in terms of medical autonomy, transparency of the review standards, the standard development and application process, and the post-review adjustment process. Furthermore, only 0.7% of the respondents evaluated the government’s reform plan positively—particularly, the utilization of clinical practice guidelines for review standards, introduction of the professional review committee, and expansion of the link between the review and assessment system.Conclusion: Policymakers should understand physicians’ perception and evaluation of the health insurance review system. In addition, the reform plan should be thoroughly communicated to physicians.
医师对国民健康保险报销理赔审查评估制度改革的看法
背景:韩国政府一直在推进国民健康保险报销报销审查和评估制度的改革。本研究旨在了解医师对医疗保险审查评估制度的认知与评价,为政府改革计划提供方向。方法:于2020年11月19日至2021年1月10日,向57,714名大韩医学会会员发放《2020年韩国医师调查问卷》。共有6507名医生(11.5%)回应;其中,包括个体户和就业者、教授、研究员等4454人的回答进行了分析。调查对象对现行医保审查制度和政府改革计划的看法进行了分析。结果:84.2%的受访者对现行医疗保险审查制度持否定态度,特别是在医疗自主权、审查标准的透明度、标准制定和应用过程以及审查后调整过程方面。此外,只有0.7%的受访者积极评价政府的改革方案,特别是在使用临床实践指南作为审查标准,引入专业审查委员会以及扩大审查与评估制度之间的联系方面。结论:决策者应了解医生对医保审查制度的看法和评价。此外,改革方案应充分传达给医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of The Korean Medical Association
Journal of The Korean Medical Association Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Korean Medical Association (JKMA) is the official peer-reviewed, open-access, monthly journal of the Korean Medical Association (KMA). It contains articles in Korean or English. Its abbreviated title is ''J Korean Med Assoc''. The aims of the Journal include contributing to the treatment of and preventing diseases of public health importance and to improvement of health and quality of life through sharing the state-of the-art scientific information on medicine by the members of KMA and other national and international societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信