Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy to Treat Colorectal Liver Metastases: Ready for Prime-Time?

K. Nielsen, Van der Sluis Wb, H. Scheffer, M. Meijerink, Comans Efi, B. Slotman, S. Meijer, van den Tol Mp, Haasbeek Cja
{"title":"Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy to Treat Colorectal Liver Metastases: Ready for Prime-Time?","authors":"K. Nielsen, Van der Sluis Wb, H. Scheffer, M. Meijerink, Comans Efi, B. Slotman, S. Meijer, van den Tol Mp, Haasbeek Cja","doi":"10.4172/2167-0889.1000139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) is a non-invasive treatment option for patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases (CRLM) ineligible for resection or thermal ablation. The aim of our study was to evaluate local control, disease progression, toxicity, complications and survival after SABR of CRLM. We also discuss the place of SABR in the treatment algorithm of CRLM. Methods: Patients with CRLM, ineligible for resection or thermal ablation and suitable for SABR, were included in our database and retrospectively analyzed. Patients with oligometastases <5 cm without the presence of other organs in the target area are eligible for SABR. Follow-up imaging was conducted at 3 and 6 months following SABR and 6-monthly thereafter. Total delivered dose per lesion was 54-60 Gy, divided over 3-12 fractions, depending on the dose constraints of normal tissues. Results: Ten patients with 13 lesions were treated with SABR. Complete local control was achieved in eight patients with 11 lesions, with a median follow-up of 20.4 months (range 7-38). Two patients showed possible local progressive disease after 12 and 25 months. No toxicity > grade 2 as a result of treatment was reported. Eight patients had died at time of analysis; median survival was 26 months. Conclusion: SABR of CRLM is safe, feasible and effective in achieving local control in patients ineligible for resection or thermal ablation. Although SABR is currently offered in a late and often palliative stage, it deserves a higher profile as a possible local treatment option and its place in the treatment algorithm should be re-evaluated.","PeriodicalId":16145,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liver","volume":"114 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liver","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0889.1000139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) is a non-invasive treatment option for patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases (CRLM) ineligible for resection or thermal ablation. The aim of our study was to evaluate local control, disease progression, toxicity, complications and survival after SABR of CRLM. We also discuss the place of SABR in the treatment algorithm of CRLM. Methods: Patients with CRLM, ineligible for resection or thermal ablation and suitable for SABR, were included in our database and retrospectively analyzed. Patients with oligometastases <5 cm without the presence of other organs in the target area are eligible for SABR. Follow-up imaging was conducted at 3 and 6 months following SABR and 6-monthly thereafter. Total delivered dose per lesion was 54-60 Gy, divided over 3-12 fractions, depending on the dose constraints of normal tissues. Results: Ten patients with 13 lesions were treated with SABR. Complete local control was achieved in eight patients with 11 lesions, with a median follow-up of 20.4 months (range 7-38). Two patients showed possible local progressive disease after 12 and 25 months. No toxicity > grade 2 as a result of treatment was reported. Eight patients had died at time of analysis; median survival was 26 months. Conclusion: SABR of CRLM is safe, feasible and effective in achieving local control in patients ineligible for resection or thermal ablation. Although SABR is currently offered in a late and often palliative stage, it deserves a higher profile as a possible local treatment option and its place in the treatment algorithm should be re-evaluated.
立体定向消融放疗治疗结直肠肝转移:准备好黄金时间了吗?
背景:立体定向消融放疗(SABR)是不适合切除或热消融的结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)患者的一种非侵入性治疗选择。本研究的目的是评估CRLM SABR后的局部控制、疾病进展、毒性、并发症和生存。我们还讨论了SABR在CRLM处理算法中的地位。方法:将不适合切除或热消融但适合SABR的CRLM患者纳入我们的数据库并进行回顾性分析。2级低转移患者作为治疗的结果被报道。8例患者在分析时死亡;中位生存期为26个月。结论:对于不适合切除或热消融的CRLM患者,SABR是安全、可行、有效的局部控制方法。虽然SABR目前是在晚期且通常是姑息治疗阶段提供的,但作为一种可能的局部治疗选择,它应该得到更高的关注,并且应该重新评估其在治疗算法中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信