Chemical treatment of straw for ruminant feeding with NaOH or urea – investigative steps via practical application under current European Union conditions

IF 1 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
S. Martens, Vicki Wildner, Johanna Schulze, W. Richardt, J. Greef, A. Zeyner, O. Steinhöfel
{"title":"Chemical treatment of straw for ruminant feeding with NaOH or urea – investigative steps via practical application under current European Union conditions","authors":"S. Martens, Vicki Wildner, Johanna Schulze, W. Richardt, J. Greef, A. Zeyner, O. Steinhöfel","doi":"10.23986/afsci.115262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Weather extremes in parts of Europe have led to a renewed search for alternative feeds for ruminants. Cereal straw presents one source of fibre, which is hard to digest due to its lignin-carbohydrate complexes. Chemical and biological treatments have been investigated to improve digestibility. Here, the applicability of alkaline treatments for farming conditions under EU legislation and their efficacy were checked. Thus, we tested caustic soda (60, 120 g kg-1straw) and urea (15, 30, 45, 60 g kg-1 straw without and with urease addition) applications both at laboratory scale and using a mixer-wagon. The nutritive value was evaluated analyzing chemical parameters including fibre components and estimating in vitro digestibility. The in vitro digestibility indicated by gas production, enzymatically soluble substrate and neutral detergent fibre digestibility (30h) was highest for the NaOH treatments, which did not differ by dose. Remoistening the straw to 600 g DM kg-1 was a precondition for the effectiveness of both treatments. Urease addition enhanced the intended ammonification when urea was applied at ≥ 30 g kg-1. An ambient temperature for urea treatment ≥ 25 °C was necessary and had to be maintained for at least 14 d post treatment. The determination of crude ash in NaOH treated feeds by the standard procedure and time overestimated the mineral fraction and had to be modified. This systematic approach provides guidance for feasible straw treatments for EU farmers. However, trials for feed acceptance and in vivo digestibility are needed to demonstrate the real effect in animals.","PeriodicalId":7393,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Food Science","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.115262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Weather extremes in parts of Europe have led to a renewed search for alternative feeds for ruminants. Cereal straw presents one source of fibre, which is hard to digest due to its lignin-carbohydrate complexes. Chemical and biological treatments have been investigated to improve digestibility. Here, the applicability of alkaline treatments for farming conditions under EU legislation and their efficacy were checked. Thus, we tested caustic soda (60, 120 g kg-1straw) and urea (15, 30, 45, 60 g kg-1 straw without and with urease addition) applications both at laboratory scale and using a mixer-wagon. The nutritive value was evaluated analyzing chemical parameters including fibre components and estimating in vitro digestibility. The in vitro digestibility indicated by gas production, enzymatically soluble substrate and neutral detergent fibre digestibility (30h) was highest for the NaOH treatments, which did not differ by dose. Remoistening the straw to 600 g DM kg-1 was a precondition for the effectiveness of both treatments. Urease addition enhanced the intended ammonification when urea was applied at ≥ 30 g kg-1. An ambient temperature for urea treatment ≥ 25 °C was necessary and had to be maintained for at least 14 d post treatment. The determination of crude ash in NaOH treated feeds by the standard procedure and time overestimated the mineral fraction and had to be modified. This systematic approach provides guidance for feasible straw treatments for EU farmers. However, trials for feed acceptance and in vivo digestibility are needed to demonstrate the real effect in animals.
用氢氧化钠或尿素化学处理秸秆用于反刍动物饲养-在当前欧盟条件下通过实际应用的研究步骤
欧洲部分地区的极端天气导致人们重新寻找反刍动物的替代饲料。谷物秸秆是纤维的一种来源,由于其木质素-碳水化合物复合物而难以消化。已经研究了化学和生物处理来提高消化率。在这里,碱性处理在欧盟立法下对农业条件的适用性及其有效性进行了检查。因此,我们在实验室规模和使用混合车测试了烧碱(60、120 g kg-1吸管)和尿素(15、30、45、60 g kg-1吸管,不添加脲酶和添加脲酶)的应用。通过分析纤维成分等化学参数和体外消化率来评价其营养价值。以产气量、酶溶底物和中性洗涤纤维消化率(30h)为指标,NaOH处理的体外消化率最高,且无剂量差异。将秸秆重温至600 g DM kg-1是两种处理均有效的先决条件。当尿素用量≥30 g kg-1时,尿素酶的添加增强了预期的氨化作用。尿素处理的环境温度≥25°C是必要的,并且必须在处理后至少保持14 d。用标准程序和时间测定氢氧化钠处理饲料中的粗灰分,过高估计了矿物组分,必须加以修正。这种系统的方法为欧盟农民提供了可行的秸秆处理指导。然而,需要对饲料接受度和体内消化率进行试验,以证明其在动物中的实际效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural and Food Science
Agricultural and Food Science 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Food Science (AFSci) publishes original research reports on agriculture and food research related to primary production and which have a northern dimension. The fields within the scope of the journal include agricultural economics, agricultural engineering, animal science, environmental science, horticulture, plant and soil science and primary production-related food science. Papers covering both basic and applied research are welcome. AFSci is published by the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland. AFSci, former The Journal of the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland, has been published regularly since 1928. Alongside the printed version, online publishing began in 2000. Since the year 2010 Agricultural and Food Science has only been available online as an Open Access journal, provided to the user free of charge. Full texts are available online from 1945 on.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信