Ensuring Data Quality: What Criteria Do Monitors Use to Rate Interviewers?

Josephine C. Baker, C. Gentile, Jason Markesich, Shawn C. Marsh, Erin Panzarella, Rebecca Weiner
{"title":"Ensuring Data Quality: What Criteria Do Monitors Use to Rate Interviewers?","authors":"Josephine C. Baker, C. Gentile, Jason Markesich, Shawn C. Marsh, Erin Panzarella, Rebecca Weiner","doi":"10.29115/sp-2013-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like most survey research organizations, Mathematica Policy Research monitors telephone interviewers to ensure that they collect high-quality data. Monitors identify problems with survey questions, recommend interviewing techniques, and retrain interviewers whose performance do not meet expectations. Because monitoring is a critical quality assurance tool, we are interested in understanding the behavior of monitors – specifically, their ability to provide effective and consistent feedback on interviewers’ performance. Mathematica implements several best practices to promote monitoring consistency:","PeriodicalId":18335,"journal":{"name":"Mathematica Policy Research Reports","volume":"163 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematica Policy Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29115/sp-2013-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Like most survey research organizations, Mathematica Policy Research monitors telephone interviewers to ensure that they collect high-quality data. Monitors identify problems with survey questions, recommend interviewing techniques, and retrain interviewers whose performance do not meet expectations. Because monitoring is a critical quality assurance tool, we are interested in understanding the behavior of monitors – specifically, their ability to provide effective and consistent feedback on interviewers’ performance. Mathematica implements several best practices to promote monitoring consistency:
确保数据质量:监控器使用什么标准来评价采访者?
像大多数调查研究机构一样,Mathematica Policy research会监控电话采访者,以确保他们收集到高质量的数据。监察员识别调查问题中的问题,推荐面试技巧,并对表现不符合预期的面试官进行再培训。因为监控是一种重要的质量保证工具,我们对了解监控者的行为很感兴趣——特别是他们对采访者的表现提供有效和一致反馈的能力。Mathematica实现了几个最佳实践来促进监控一致性:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信