HSCT with Mismatched Unrelated Donors (MMUD): A Comparison of Different Platforms for GvHD Prophylaxis

Q4 Medicine
Massimo Berger, Marta Barone, F. Carnevale-Schianca, M. De Gobbi, P. Nicoli, D. Caravelli, D. Cilloni, L. Paruzzo, M. Spadea, K. Mareschi, M. Aglietta, F. Fagioli
{"title":"HSCT with Mismatched Unrelated Donors (MMUD): A Comparison of Different Platforms for GvHD Prophylaxis","authors":"Massimo Berger, Marta Barone, F. Carnevale-Schianca, M. De Gobbi, P. Nicoli, D. Caravelli, D. Cilloni, L. Paruzzo, M. Spadea, K. Mareschi, M. Aglietta, F. Fagioli","doi":"10.3390/transplantology3010006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HSCT from an unrelated HLA-mismatched donor (MMUD) is one of the alternatives where an HLA-matched donor is not found. The aim of this study was to compare GvHD prophylaxis with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) vs. post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy). Thirty-nine adult patients were uniformly treated with rabbit ATG-Cy-A-MTX and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) and 40 adult patients with PT-Cy-MMF-tacrolimus and PBSC. This retrospective study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04598789. Three-year overall survival was 42% vs. 64% for ATG and PT-Cy (p < 0.0005), three-year treatment-related mortality (TRM) was 36% vs. 8% (p = 0.0033) and the three-year relapse incidence (RI) was 15% vs. 28% (p = NS), respectively. The incidences of day-100 GvHD graded II–IV and III–IV were 39% vs. 7% (p = 0.0006) and 11% vs. 0% (p = 0.04), respectively, whereas the three-year cGvHD incidences were 48% vs. 13% (p = 0.0005), respectively. We were able to show how PT-Cy can reduce the incidence of GvHDs and TRM in adults, but relapse remains an issue.","PeriodicalId":36461,"journal":{"name":"Cell and Organ Transplantology","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell and Organ Transplantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/transplantology3010006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

HSCT from an unrelated HLA-mismatched donor (MMUD) is one of the alternatives where an HLA-matched donor is not found. The aim of this study was to compare GvHD prophylaxis with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) vs. post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy). Thirty-nine adult patients were uniformly treated with rabbit ATG-Cy-A-MTX and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) and 40 adult patients with PT-Cy-MMF-tacrolimus and PBSC. This retrospective study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04598789. Three-year overall survival was 42% vs. 64% for ATG and PT-Cy (p < 0.0005), three-year treatment-related mortality (TRM) was 36% vs. 8% (p = 0.0033) and the three-year relapse incidence (RI) was 15% vs. 28% (p = NS), respectively. The incidences of day-100 GvHD graded II–IV and III–IV were 39% vs. 7% (p = 0.0006) and 11% vs. 0% (p = 0.04), respectively, whereas the three-year cGvHD incidences were 48% vs. 13% (p = 0.0005), respectively. We were able to show how PT-Cy can reduce the incidence of GvHDs and TRM in adults, but relapse remains an issue.
不匹配非亲属供体(MMUD)的HSCT: GvHD预防不同平台的比较
来自不相关hla错配供体(MMUD)的HSCT是找不到hla匹配供体的替代方法之一。本研究的目的是比较抗胸腺细胞球蛋白(ATG)和移植后环磷酰胺(PT-Cy)预防GvHD的效果。39例成人患者采用兔ATG-Cy-A-MTX联合外周血干细胞(PBSC)治疗,40例成人患者采用pt - cy - mmf -他克莫司联合外周血干细胞治疗。这项回顾性研究注册在ClinicalTrials.gov网站NCT04598789。ATG组和PT-Cy组的3年总生存率分别为42%和64% (p < 0.0005), 3年治疗相关死亡率(TRM)分别为36%和8% (p = 0.0033), 3年复发率(RI)分别为15%和28% (p = NS)。第100天GvHD分级II-IV和III-IV的发病率分别为39%对7% (p = 0.0006)和11%对0% (p = 0.04),而3年cGvHD发病率分别为48%对13% (p = 0.0005)。我们能够证明PT-Cy如何降低成人gvhd和TRM的发病率,但复发仍然是一个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cell and Organ Transplantology
Cell and Organ Transplantology Medicine-Transplantation
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信