Projectifying feminism: exploring the conditions for feminist politics in international development aid

IF 2 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
David Scott, Malin Rönnblom
{"title":"Projectifying feminism: exploring the conditions for feminist politics in international development aid","authors":"David Scott, Malin Rönnblom","doi":"10.1332/251510821x16467490969176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As an organisational form, the project poses a challenge today for the possibility of articulating feminist politics, understood as feminist visions and ambitions. With a focus on women’s organisations working in international development aid, we examine how the project format and its managerial attributes shape the possibility of articulating feminist politics. Mobilising assemblage thinking on a material consisting mainly of interviews with project workers in women’s organisations, we show that these organisations engage in assembly work to fit their activism with the project format, such as translating feminist ambitions into bureaucratic procedures and notions of temporality, activating repertoires of expertise, and adopting marketised approaches to development. We conclude that the project format depoliticises feminist politics, although it does not make the articulation of feminist ambitions impossible. Assemblage thinking is suggested as a suitable framework for feminist research when investigating how contemporary governing arrangements influence the articulation of feminist politics.Key messagesThe project format influences how women’s organisations articulate feminist politics.Women’s organisations engage in the work of adaptation and translation to fit feminist politics with the managerial features of the project format, resulting in co-optation and resistance.Assemblage thinking is suggested as a conceptual framework for exploring how feminist politics is shaped by the project format.","PeriodicalId":36315,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Politics and Gender","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821x16467490969176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

As an organisational form, the project poses a challenge today for the possibility of articulating feminist politics, understood as feminist visions and ambitions. With a focus on women’s organisations working in international development aid, we examine how the project format and its managerial attributes shape the possibility of articulating feminist politics. Mobilising assemblage thinking on a material consisting mainly of interviews with project workers in women’s organisations, we show that these organisations engage in assembly work to fit their activism with the project format, such as translating feminist ambitions into bureaucratic procedures and notions of temporality, activating repertoires of expertise, and adopting marketised approaches to development. We conclude that the project format depoliticises feminist politics, although it does not make the articulation of feminist ambitions impossible. Assemblage thinking is suggested as a suitable framework for feminist research when investigating how contemporary governing arrangements influence the articulation of feminist politics.Key messagesThe project format influences how women’s organisations articulate feminist politics.Women’s organisations engage in the work of adaptation and translation to fit feminist politics with the managerial features of the project format, resulting in co-optation and resistance.Assemblage thinking is suggested as a conceptual framework for exploring how feminist politics is shaped by the project format.
女性主义的投射:探索国际发展援助中女性主义政治的条件
作为一种组织形式,该项目对今天表达女权主义政治的可能性提出了挑战,被理解为女权主义的愿景和抱负。以从事国际发展援助工作的妇女组织为重点,我们研究了项目形式及其管理属性如何塑造表达女权主义政治的可能性。在一份主要由对妇女组织项目工作者的采访组成的材料上,我们调动了集合思维,表明这些组织从事集合工作是为了使他们的行动主义与项目形式相适应,例如将女权主义的雄心转化为官僚程序和暂时性的概念,激活专业技能,并采用市场化的发展方法。我们的结论是,项目形式使女权主义政治非政治化,尽管它并没有使女权主义野心的表达成为不可能。当研究当代治理安排如何影响女性主义政治的表达时,组合思维被认为是女性主义研究的合适框架。项目形式影响妇女组织如何表达女权主义政治。妇女组织为了使女权主义政治与项目形式的管理特征相适应,进行了改编和翻译工作,导致了合作和抵制。组合思维被建议作为一个概念框架来探索女权主义政治是如何被项目形式塑造的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Politics and Gender
European Journal of Politics and Gender Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.50%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信