Rethinking ‘architect’ and ‘architecture’

IF 0.2 4区艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE

arq-Architectural Research Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1017/S1359135522000318

J. Chatterjee

引用次数: 0

Abstract

My fellow architects, let me begin this piece with a provocative, even blasphemous, proposition: it is time to do away with the twin terms ‘architect’ and ‘architecture’ as signs that stand in for what we are, what we do or as a ‘thing’ in the world.

查看原文本刊更多论文

我的建筑师同行们，让我以一个挑衅的，甚至是亵渎的命题开始这篇文章:是时候抛弃“建筑师”和“建筑”这两个术语了，它们代表着我们是什么，我们做什么，或者作为世界上的一个“东西”。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

arq-Architectural Research Quarterly ARCHITECTURE-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Arq publishes cutting-edge work covering all aspects of architectural endeavour. Contents include building design, urbanism, history, theory, environmental design, construction, materials, information technology, and practice. Other features include interviews, occasional reports, lively letters pages, book reviews and an end feature, Insight. Reviews of significant buildings are published at length and in a detail matched today by few other architectural journals. Elegantly designed, inspirational and often provocative, arq is essential reading for practitioners in industry and consultancy as well as for academic researchers.