Comparative Efficiency of Different Weed Management Practices on Yield and Economic in Summer Maize in Dang

A. Shrestha, B. Thapa, M. Devkota, R. Subedi
{"title":"Comparative Efficiency of Different Weed Management Practices on Yield and Economic in Summer Maize in Dang","authors":"A. Shrestha, B. Thapa, M. Devkota, R. Subedi","doi":"10.4172/2329-8863.1000354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The particular weed management practice is still know that describes the exact solution for weed control and maximizes the yield and profitability of maize production and weed severs to more than 40% loss in production. So, the field experiment was conducted in Farmer’s field to compare the effects of different weed management practices on weed growth and dynamics, yield, and economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition at Aswara-5, Tulsipur, and Dang in 2017. The experiment was conducted in Randomized Complete Block Design with seven treatments and three replications. The treatments consisted of (i) Framer practices, (ii) control, (iii) weed free broadcasting (iv) Weed free line sowing (v) power weeded (vi) Manually weeded (vii) herbicides (Temboterine and Atrazine). The different weed managements practice showed significant effect in Yield, test weight, Harvest index, stover yield, shelling percent and sterility percent and cob length. The higher grain yield was obtained in herbicide treated plot (7.620 t/ha) and least in control plot (3.54 t/ha) and farmer practice plot (4.32 t/ha) where other treatment were statistically at par with each other. The highest shelling and cob length was 78.33 and 21.76 cm found highest that leads to highest yield and lower yield in control and farmer plot. The cost of cultivation was higher in weed free line sowing (NRs 89102) and broadcasting (NRs 89106) condition but the production per unit cost was highest in herbicides (109.27 g/Rs) plot and followed by manual (69.73 g/Rs) and power weeded plot(78.11 g/Rs). Similarly, the highest Net revenue, Gross revenue and Benefit cost ratio was obtained in Herbicide treated plot among all the treatment, which is followed by power weeded plot. So, we can conclude that, herbicide treated plot is economically and profitability important in terms of production where there is human labour crisis.","PeriodicalId":7255,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Crop Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Crop Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-8863.1000354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The particular weed management practice is still know that describes the exact solution for weed control and maximizes the yield and profitability of maize production and weed severs to more than 40% loss in production. So, the field experiment was conducted in Farmer’s field to compare the effects of different weed management practices on weed growth and dynamics, yield, and economic performance in Summer Maize under humid sub-tropical condition at Aswara-5, Tulsipur, and Dang in 2017. The experiment was conducted in Randomized Complete Block Design with seven treatments and three replications. The treatments consisted of (i) Framer practices, (ii) control, (iii) weed free broadcasting (iv) Weed free line sowing (v) power weeded (vi) Manually weeded (vii) herbicides (Temboterine and Atrazine). The different weed managements practice showed significant effect in Yield, test weight, Harvest index, stover yield, shelling percent and sterility percent and cob length. The higher grain yield was obtained in herbicide treated plot (7.620 t/ha) and least in control plot (3.54 t/ha) and farmer practice plot (4.32 t/ha) where other treatment were statistically at par with each other. The highest shelling and cob length was 78.33 and 21.76 cm found highest that leads to highest yield and lower yield in control and farmer plot. The cost of cultivation was higher in weed free line sowing (NRs 89102) and broadcasting (NRs 89106) condition but the production per unit cost was highest in herbicides (109.27 g/Rs) plot and followed by manual (69.73 g/Rs) and power weeded plot(78.11 g/Rs). Similarly, the highest Net revenue, Gross revenue and Benefit cost ratio was obtained in Herbicide treated plot among all the treatment, which is followed by power weeded plot. So, we can conclude that, herbicide treated plot is economically and profitability important in terms of production where there is human labour crisis.
不同杂草管理措施对党地夏玉米产量和经济效益的比较
特定的杂草管理实践仍然是已知的,它描述了杂草控制的确切解决方案,并最大限度地提高了玉米生产的产量和盈利能力,而杂草在生产中造成的损失超过40%。因此,本研究于2017年在Aswara-5、Tulsipur和Dang的农民田间进行了田间试验,比较了湿润亚热带条件下不同杂草管理措施对夏玉米杂草生长动态、产量和经济效益的影响。试验采用随机完全区组设计,7个处理,3个重复。处理包括(i)农民做法,(ii)控制,(iii)无杂草播撒(iv)无杂草线播(v)动力除草(vi)人工除草(vii)除草剂(Temboterine和Atrazine)。不同杂草管理方式对玉米产量、试重、收获指数、秸秆产量、脱壳率、不育率和穗轴长均有显著影响。除草剂处理区产量最高(7.620 t/ha),对照区产量最低(3.54 t/ha),农民实践区产量最低(4.32 t/ha),其他处理差异无统计学意义。脱壳长78.33 cm,穗轴长21.76 cm,在对照区和农民区最高产量和最低产量。无公害线播(89102)和撒播(89106)条件下栽培成本较高,但单位成本产量在除草剂畦最高(109.27 g/Rs),其次是人工畦(69.73 g/Rs)和动力除草畦(78.11 g/Rs)。同样,除草剂处理地块的净收入、毛收入和效益成本比最高,其次是动力除草。因此,我们可以得出结论,在存在人力危机的地区,除草剂处理地块在经济上和盈利上都是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信