Disinfection and sterilization in gynaecological endoscopy: problems and costs

M. Franchini md, L. Cianferoni md, A. Appicciafuoco md, A. R. Marseglia md
{"title":"Disinfection and sterilization in gynaecological endoscopy: problems and costs","authors":"M. Franchini md, L. Cianferoni md, A. Appicciafuoco md, A. R. Marseglia md","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.133-gy0551.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo determine and compare the total costs of two low-temperature sterilization systems. \n \nDesign \nThe direct and indirect costs of ethylene oxide and hydrogen peroxide plasma sterilization were recorded over a 6-month period. Break-even point analysis was performed to establish when the use of the gas plasma system represented a cost saving. \n \nResults \nHydrogen peroxide plasma sterilization represented a cost saving after 95 units of sterilization. \n \nConclusions \nGas plasma sterilization was shown to be a valid method in hospital procedures with respect to both economy and quality.","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"6 6","pages":"359-362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.133-gy0551.x","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2508.1997.133-gy0551.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective To determine and compare the total costs of two low-temperature sterilization systems. Design The direct and indirect costs of ethylene oxide and hydrogen peroxide plasma sterilization were recorded over a 6-month period. Break-even point analysis was performed to establish when the use of the gas plasma system represented a cost saving. Results Hydrogen peroxide plasma sterilization represented a cost saving after 95 units of sterilization. Conclusions Gas plasma sterilization was shown to be a valid method in hospital procedures with respect to both economy and quality.
妇科内窥镜的消毒和灭菌:问题和成本
目的确定并比较两种低温灭菌系统的总成本。设计记录6个月期间环氧乙烷和双氧水等离子体灭菌的直接和间接成本。进行了盈亏平衡点分析,以确定何时使用气体等离子体系统可以节省成本。结果双氧水等离子体灭菌在95台消毒后可节省成本。结论气体等离子体灭菌在医院手术中是一种经济、有效的灭菌方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信