ADAS-CoG and mental deterioration battery: Different instruments for different aspects of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease

L. Serra, R. Perri, G. Carlesimo, L. Fadda, S. Lorusso, A. Padovani, C. Pettenati, Maia Vegliante, C. Caltagirone
{"title":"ADAS-CoG and mental deterioration battery: Different instruments for different aspects of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease","authors":"L. Serra, R. Perri, G. Carlesimo, L. Fadda, S. Lorusso, A. Padovani, C. Pettenati, Maia Vegliante, C. Caltagirone","doi":"10.1002/NRC.20032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Aim of this study was to compare ADAS-Cog and MDB, instruments usually used in cognitive assessment of AD patients, relative to: 1) diagnostic sensitivity for dementia of AD; 2) ability to rate the progression of cognitive decline and ability to detect the qualitative characteristics of cognitive decline. Material and methods: A sample of 54 AD patients was submitted to a cognitive assessment with both battery at time of study entry (T 0) and after 12 months (T 12). Results: This study showed: 1) a better diagnostic sensitivity of MDB respect to ADAS-Cog in diagnosing patients affected by mild to moderate levels of AD; 2) a better sensitivity of ADAS-Cog to follow the cognitive decline over a twelve-months period Conclusion: These results supports the use of the MDB in the screening phase of AD patients and of ADAS-Cog to follow the progression of cognitive decline over time.","PeriodicalId":19198,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Research Communications","volume":"10 1","pages":"184-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Research Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/NRC.20032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Aim of this study was to compare ADAS-Cog and MDB, instruments usually used in cognitive assessment of AD patients, relative to: 1) diagnostic sensitivity for dementia of AD; 2) ability to rate the progression of cognitive decline and ability to detect the qualitative characteristics of cognitive decline. Material and methods: A sample of 54 AD patients was submitted to a cognitive assessment with both battery at time of study entry (T 0) and after 12 months (T 12). Results: This study showed: 1) a better diagnostic sensitivity of MDB respect to ADAS-Cog in diagnosing patients affected by mild to moderate levels of AD; 2) a better sensitivity of ADAS-Cog to follow the cognitive decline over a twelve-months period Conclusion: These results supports the use of the MDB in the screening phase of AD patients and of ADAS-Cog to follow the progression of cognitive decline over time.
ADAS-CoG和精神退化电池:不同的仪器用于阿尔茨海默病认知能力下降的不同方面
目的:本研究的目的是比较ADAS-Cog和MDB这两种常用的AD患者认知评估工具在以下方面的差异:1)AD痴呆的诊断敏感性;2)评价认知衰退进展的能力和检测认知衰退定性特征的能力。材料和方法:54例AD患者在研究开始时(t0)和12个月后(t12)接受认知评估。结果:本研究表明:1)MDB相对于ADAS-Cog在诊断轻中度AD患者中具有更好的诊断敏感性;结论:这些结果支持在AD患者筛查阶段使用MDB,并支持ADAS-Cog随时间跟踪认知能力下降的进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信