The markers of the organic acidemias and their ratios in healthy neonates in Serbian population

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
A. Beletić, Aleksandra Tijanić, P. Chrastina, T. Nikolić, A. Stefanović, S. Stanković
{"title":"The markers of the organic acidemias and their ratios in healthy neonates in Serbian population","authors":"A. Beletić, Aleksandra Tijanić, P. Chrastina, T. Nikolić, A. Stefanović, S. Stanković","doi":"10.1515/dmpt-2021-0218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives The newborn screening (NBS) program in the Republic of Serbia has several decades of tradition, but it has not included any organic acidemias (OA). Therefore, this study aimed to establish the cut-offs of the corresponding NBS markers in the population of healthy newborns. Methods In dried blood samples (DBS) collected from 1,771 healthy newborns, we analyzed levels of propionylcarnitine (C3), isovalerylcarnitine (C5), and glutarylcarnitine (C5DC) using tandem mass spectrometry. Further we calculated the following ratios: C3/acetylcarnitine (C3/C2), C3/palmitoylcarnitine (C3/C16), C5/ free carnitine (C0), C5/C2, C5/C3, C5DC/octanoylcarnitine (C8), and C5DC/C0. Results The cut-offs for methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) or propionic acidemia (PA) were C3>5.73 μmol/L, C3/C2>0.23, and C3/C16>2.36. Based on the study findings, the screening results indicative for isovaleric acidemia (IVA) would include C5>0.372 μmol/L, C5/C0>0.020, C5/C2>0.019, and C5/C3>0.31. Finally, C5DC>0.303 μmol/L, C5DC/C8>7.1, and C5DC/C0>0.019 would justify further testing for glutaric acidemia type I (GA1). The cut-offs were satisfactorily validated via the comparison with worldwide estimates and data for several Caucasian populations. Conclusions The levels of the OA biomarkers in the Serbian population of healthy newborns have a distribution pattern similar to the other world populations. Therefore, the proposed cut-offs represent a reliable starting point for the future development of the OA NBS.","PeriodicalId":11332,"journal":{"name":"Drug metabolism and personalized therapy","volume":"36 1","pages":"271 - 275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug metabolism and personalized therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dmpt-2021-0218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The newborn screening (NBS) program in the Republic of Serbia has several decades of tradition, but it has not included any organic acidemias (OA). Therefore, this study aimed to establish the cut-offs of the corresponding NBS markers in the population of healthy newborns. Methods In dried blood samples (DBS) collected from 1,771 healthy newborns, we analyzed levels of propionylcarnitine (C3), isovalerylcarnitine (C5), and glutarylcarnitine (C5DC) using tandem mass spectrometry. Further we calculated the following ratios: C3/acetylcarnitine (C3/C2), C3/palmitoylcarnitine (C3/C16), C5/ free carnitine (C0), C5/C2, C5/C3, C5DC/octanoylcarnitine (C8), and C5DC/C0. Results The cut-offs for methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) or propionic acidemia (PA) were C3>5.73 μmol/L, C3/C2>0.23, and C3/C16>2.36. Based on the study findings, the screening results indicative for isovaleric acidemia (IVA) would include C5>0.372 μmol/L, C5/C0>0.020, C5/C2>0.019, and C5/C3>0.31. Finally, C5DC>0.303 μmol/L, C5DC/C8>7.1, and C5DC/C0>0.019 would justify further testing for glutaric acidemia type I (GA1). The cut-offs were satisfactorily validated via the comparison with worldwide estimates and data for several Caucasian populations. Conclusions The levels of the OA biomarkers in the Serbian population of healthy newborns have a distribution pattern similar to the other world populations. Therefore, the proposed cut-offs represent a reliable starting point for the future development of the OA NBS.
塞尔维亚健康新生儿有机酸血症的标志物及其比率
目的塞尔维亚共和国的新生儿筛查(NBS)项目有几十年的传统,但它没有包括任何有机酸血症(OA)。因此,本研究旨在建立健康新生儿群体中相应NBS标记的截止值。方法采用串联质谱法分析1771例健康新生儿干血(DBS)中丙戊基肉碱(C3)、异戊基肉碱(C5)和戊二基肉碱(C5DC)的含量。我们进一步计算了以下比率:C3/乙酰肉碱(C3/C2), C3/棕榈肉碱(C3/C16), C5/游离肉碱(C0), C5/C2, C5/C3, C5DC/辛烷肉碱(C8)和C5DC/C0。结果甲基丙二酸血症(MMA)和丙酸血症(PA)的截止值分别为C3>5.73 μmol/L、C3/C2>0.23、C3/C16>2.36。根据研究结果,提示异戊酸血症(IVA)的筛选结果为C5>0.372 μmol/L、C5/C0>0.020、C5/C2>0.019、C5/C3>0.31。最后,C5DC>0.303 μmol/L、C5DC/C8>7.1、C5DC/C0>0.019可作为进一步检测I型戊二酸血症(GA1)的依据。通过与世界范围内的估计和几个高加索人群的数据进行比较,这些截断值得到了令人满意的验证。结论塞尔维亚健康新生儿OA生物标志物水平与世界其他人群具有相似的分布规律。因此,建议的截止点代表了OA国家统计局未来发展的可靠起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug metabolism and personalized therapy
Drug metabolism and personalized therapy Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Drug Metabolism and Personalized Therapy (DMPT) is a peer-reviewed journal, and is abstracted/indexed in relevant major Abstracting Services. It provides up-to-date research articles, reviews and opinion papers in the wide field of drug metabolism research, covering established, new and potential drugs, environmentally toxic chemicals, the mechanisms by which drugs may interact with each other and with biological systems, and the pharmacological and toxicological consequences of these interactions and drug metabolism and excretion. Topics: drug metabolizing enzymes, pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics, biochemical pharmacology, molecular pathology, clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions, immunopharmacology, neuropsychopharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信