Sustainable-inclusive development through conversational thinking: The case for Africa – China relations

Q1 Arts and Humanities
M. Enyimba
{"title":"Sustainable-inclusive development through conversational thinking: The case for Africa – China relations","authors":"M. Enyimba","doi":"10.4314/FT.V8I1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"My aim in this paper is to show the necessity and possibility of  implementing inclusive development that is sustainable in Africa-China relations using the Conversational technique. I contend that the foremost challenges facing inclusive and sustainable developments are the dearth of constructive and balanced relationships. If a programme of development is constructive, that is, takes into consideration every relevant variable and practicable measure, it would be sustainable; and if it is balanced, that is, being fair to all groups, it would be inclusive. Michelle and Paula (2012) have proposed that inclusive development is possible through a community-based strategy. This approach is bedeviled with difficulties which conversational thinking overcomes. Conversational thinking is a new approach in philosophical cogitation developed from the African place, but universally relevant. Its significance lies in the fact that it recognises the relevance of contending variables in a given project, and creates room for their creative engagement that opens new vistas for thought, concepts and interactions. Conversational thinking prioritises relationships that exist among development variables or groups designated as either nwansa (out-group) or nwanju (in-group) and purveys strategies for making such relationships constructive and balanced. In highlighting the importance of cultivating constructive and balanced relationships and sustaining the same, I appeal to conversational philosophy as the needed pathway for the implementation of the ideals of sustainable-inclusive development in Africa-China relations. My methods will be expository, prescriptive and analytic. Keywords: Sustainability, Inclusive Development, Conversational Thinking, Chimakonam, Africa-China Relations.","PeriodicalId":37706,"journal":{"name":"Filosofia Theoretica","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofia Theoretica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/FT.V8I1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

My aim in this paper is to show the necessity and possibility of  implementing inclusive development that is sustainable in Africa-China relations using the Conversational technique. I contend that the foremost challenges facing inclusive and sustainable developments are the dearth of constructive and balanced relationships. If a programme of development is constructive, that is, takes into consideration every relevant variable and practicable measure, it would be sustainable; and if it is balanced, that is, being fair to all groups, it would be inclusive. Michelle and Paula (2012) have proposed that inclusive development is possible through a community-based strategy. This approach is bedeviled with difficulties which conversational thinking overcomes. Conversational thinking is a new approach in philosophical cogitation developed from the African place, but universally relevant. Its significance lies in the fact that it recognises the relevance of contending variables in a given project, and creates room for their creative engagement that opens new vistas for thought, concepts and interactions. Conversational thinking prioritises relationships that exist among development variables or groups designated as either nwansa (out-group) or nwanju (in-group) and purveys strategies for making such relationships constructive and balanced. In highlighting the importance of cultivating constructive and balanced relationships and sustaining the same, I appeal to conversational philosophy as the needed pathway for the implementation of the ideals of sustainable-inclusive development in Africa-China relations. My methods will be expository, prescriptive and analytic. Keywords: Sustainability, Inclusive Development, Conversational Thinking, Chimakonam, Africa-China Relations.
对话思维下的可持续包容性发展:以中非关系为例
我在本文中的目的是通过对话技术来展示在非中关系中实施可持续的包容性发展的必要性和可能性。我认为,包容性和可持续发展面临的最大挑战是缺乏建设性和平衡的关系。如果一项发展方案是建设性的,即考虑到每一项有关变数和切实可行的措施,它就是可持续的;如果它是平衡的,也就是说,对所有群体都是公平的,它将是包容性的。Michelle和Paula(2012)提出,包容性发展可以通过以社区为基础的战略实现。这种方法被对话式思维所克服的困难所困扰。对话思维是从非洲发展起来的一种新的哲学思维方式,但具有普遍意义。它的重要性在于,它认识到给定项目中竞争变量的相关性,并为他们的创造性参与创造空间,为思想、概念和互动开辟新的前景。对话思维优先考虑存在于发展变量或被指定为nwansa(外群体)或nwanju(内群体)的群体之间的关系,并提供使这种关系具有建设性和平衡的策略。在强调培养和维持建设性、平衡的关系的重要性的同时,我呼吁将对话哲学作为中非关系中实现可持续、包容发展理想的必要途径。我的方法将是说明性、规定性和分析性的。关键词:可持续性、包容性发展、对话思维、奇马科南、非中关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Filosofia Theoretica
Filosofia Theoretica Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Filosofia Theoretica is a publication of Calabar School of Philosophy (CSP), University of Calabar. From 2018, the journal will begin to publish a third issue which will be a bi-lingual edition in both French and English languages. Filosofia Theoretica provides outlet for well researched and original papers in the following areas of African studies: philosophy, culture, religions, history and arts. It also publishes book reviews. Its publication cycle is January-June and July-December issues. The journal is abstracted/indexed on SCOPUS, EBSCO Humanities Source, ProQuest, Google Scholar, Ajol, EBSCO Database, Philosopher''s index, etc. Filosofia Theoretica is also accredited by the Department of Higher Education and Training (DoHET), South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信