The Effect of Structural Factors on Managerial Autonomy of Public Organizations: A Study of Agencification in Pakistan

Muhammad Zeb Khan, Muhammad Siddique, Z. Ullah
{"title":"The Effect of Structural Factors on Managerial Autonomy of Public Organizations: A Study of Agencification in Pakistan","authors":"Muhammad Zeb Khan, Muhammad Siddique, Z. Ullah","doi":"10.22547/ber/11.3.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Driven mainly by NPM (New Public Management) ideology, there has been increased agencification in Pakistan since the mid-1980s. The avowed objective of creating autonomous agencies is to free public managers from the direct control of political executives in financial and human resource management as a recipe for bureau-pathologies. This study examines the effect of structural characteristics of public organizations on their autonomy in the province of Khyber Pukhtunkhwa (Pakistan). The study is interesting in that it focuses on agencies within a common political-administrative context which makes the causal analysis of different agencies more meaningful. Based on the ideas from structural-instrumental perspective, this study tests a model of public agencies governance, developed by Koen Verhoest, by drawing on data collected from key respondents through standardized survey. Both descriptive and inferential statistical techniques have been used to make sense of the data and test various hypotheses. The results show that some structural factors do matter in determining the autonomy of public agencies.","PeriodicalId":80398,"journal":{"name":"Akron business and economic review","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akron business and economic review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22547/ber/11.3.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Driven mainly by NPM (New Public Management) ideology, there has been increased agencification in Pakistan since the mid-1980s. The avowed objective of creating autonomous agencies is to free public managers from the direct control of political executives in financial and human resource management as a recipe for bureau-pathologies. This study examines the effect of structural characteristics of public organizations on their autonomy in the province of Khyber Pukhtunkhwa (Pakistan). The study is interesting in that it focuses on agencies within a common political-administrative context which makes the causal analysis of different agencies more meaningful. Based on the ideas from structural-instrumental perspective, this study tests a model of public agencies governance, developed by Koen Verhoest, by drawing on data collected from key respondents through standardized survey. Both descriptive and inferential statistical techniques have been used to make sense of the data and test various hypotheses. The results show that some structural factors do matter in determining the autonomy of public agencies.
结构因素对公共组织管理自主性的影响——以巴基斯坦代理机构为例
主要受NPM(新公共管理)意识形态的推动,自20世纪80年代中期以来,巴基斯坦的机构有所增加。建立自治机构的公开目标是将公共管理人员从财政和人力资源管理方面的政治主管的直接控制中解放出来,这是解决局病的一种方法。本研究考察了开伯尔普赫图赫瓦省(巴基斯坦)公共组织的结构特征对其自治权的影响。这项研究的有趣之处在于,它把重点放在一个共同的政治-行政背景下的机构上,这使得对不同机构的因果分析更有意义。基于结构-工具视角的观点,本研究通过标准化调查收集主要受访者的数据,对Koen Verhoest开发的公共机构治理模型进行了测试。描述性和推断性统计技术都被用来解释数据和检验各种假设。结果表明,一些结构性因素在决定公共机构的自主性方面确实起着重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信