Family-provided long-term care and its coverage in European pension systems

Patricia Frericks
{"title":"Family-provided long-term care and its coverage in European pension systems","authors":"Patricia Frericks","doi":"10.20377/jfr-865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: In this contribution, the question is raised in how far family care work is covered in the social rights of European welfare states, focussing on pension entitlements for family-provided long-term care.\nBackground: Old-age pensions are the major redistributive system of present-day societies. Central to current discourses on pensions and their reforms is the relevance of work as paid employment for building up pension rights. Family care work is largely disregarded, although established welfare states broadly cover also this work form in their pension systems.\nMethod: By applying the SCQual method, this article systematically quantifies current pension entitlements for family-provided long-term care in ten European countries, and their change. It reflects on the results by means of testing assumptions drawn from the most relevant research strands in the field and contributes to contextualising cross-national variation and change.\nResults: The results show that pension entitlements for family-provided long-term care are found in most of our study countries, and that all the assumptions deduced from the literature, with regard to both cross-national variation and change in entitlements, are refuted by the empirical findings.\nConclusion: This study contributes to both the conceptual challenges of comparative welfare state research in general, and the concrete analysis of social rights entitlements. These are based not only on paid employment, but in most European countries also on family care work, as has been shown here. The conceptual differences and changes are fruitfully addressed in this contribution.","PeriodicalId":44669,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrifte Fur Familienforschung-Journal of Family Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrifte Fur Familienforschung-Journal of Family Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20377/jfr-865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In this contribution, the question is raised in how far family care work is covered in the social rights of European welfare states, focussing on pension entitlements for family-provided long-term care. Background: Old-age pensions are the major redistributive system of present-day societies. Central to current discourses on pensions and their reforms is the relevance of work as paid employment for building up pension rights. Family care work is largely disregarded, although established welfare states broadly cover also this work form in their pension systems. Method: By applying the SCQual method, this article systematically quantifies current pension entitlements for family-provided long-term care in ten European countries, and their change. It reflects on the results by means of testing assumptions drawn from the most relevant research strands in the field and contributes to contextualising cross-national variation and change. Results: The results show that pension entitlements for family-provided long-term care are found in most of our study countries, and that all the assumptions deduced from the literature, with regard to both cross-national variation and change in entitlements, are refuted by the empirical findings. Conclusion: This study contributes to both the conceptual challenges of comparative welfare state research in general, and the concrete analysis of social rights entitlements. These are based not only on paid employment, but in most European countries also on family care work, as has been shown here. The conceptual differences and changes are fruitfully addressed in this contribution.
家庭提供的长期护理及其在欧洲养老金制度中的覆盖范围
目的:在这篇文章中,提出了一个问题,即欧洲福利国家的社会权利涵盖了多少家庭护理工作,重点是家庭提供的长期护理的养老金权利。背景:养老金是当今社会的主要再分配制度。当前关于养老金及其改革的讨论的核心是工作作为有偿就业与建立养老金权利的相关性。家庭护理工作在很大程度上被忽视了,尽管已建立的福利国家在其养老金制度中也广泛涵盖了这种工作形式。方法:本文采用SCQual方法,系统量化了欧洲10个国家家庭提供的长期护理的养老金待遇及其变化。它通过检验从该领域最相关的研究链中得出的假设来反思结果,并有助于将跨国差异和变化纳入背景。结果:结果表明,家庭提供的长期护理的养老金权利在大多数研究国家都存在,并且从文献中推断的所有假设,关于权利的跨国差异和变化,都被实证结果所驳斥。结论:本研究对比较福利国家研究的概念挑战和社会权利权利的具体分析都有贡献。这些不仅是基于有偿就业,而且在大多数欧洲国家也基于家庭护理工作,如这里所示。这篇文章富有成效地论述了概念上的差异和变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信