Possible remedies to prevent the misuse of diplomatic immunity

Abstract

Since 1945, diplomatic immunity has altered. There are many factors which inhibit immunity. Firstly, consistent Cold War retaliation existed. Second, national security in the nuclear age was prioritized. The intricacy of international politics and mission expansion influenced a change. Also, the abuse of diplomatic and non-diplomatic immunity necessitated modification. In the 1960s, when hundreds of diplomats were sued, diplomatic immunity was called into doubt. Diplomatic abuses should force a reform of the Vienna Convention. Functional needs explained immunity modifications in the 1960s. Increasing and expanding immunity categories contributed to the improvement of the theory. However, there is no abuse remedy that is universally acceptable and enforceable. Should functional necessity theory replace immunity’s cloak? The pacta sunt serva concept of the noncontroversial law of treaties could be utilized to obtain multilateral agreement on the nature, cause, and effect of the functional necessity theory. A Permanent International Diplomatic Criminal Court with mandatory jurisdiction over accused diplomats and its own punishment system has been under discussion since the late 1980s. It never occurred, yet it may have resolved the diplomat disagreement between the victim and the accused.