A Comprehensive Performance Comparison of IEEE 802.15.4 DSME and TSCH in a Realistic IoT Scenario for Industrial Applications

IF 3.5 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Ivonne Andrea Mantilla Gonzalez, Florian Meyer, V. Turau
{"title":"A Comprehensive Performance Comparison of IEEE 802.15.4 DSME and TSCH in a Realistic IoT Scenario for Industrial Applications","authors":"Ivonne Andrea Mantilla Gonzalez, Florian Meyer, V. Turau","doi":"10.1145/3595188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Industrial Internet of Things (i.e., IIoT), the standardization of open technologies and protocols has achieved seamless data exchange between machines and other physical systems from different manufacturers. At the MAC sublayer, the industry-standard protocols IEEE 802.15.4 Time Slot Channel Hopping (TSCH) and Deterministic and Synchronous Multi-channel Extension (DSME) show promising properties for high adaptability and dynamically changing traffic. However, performance comparison between these MAC protocols rarely has gone beyond a simulation phase. This work presents the results of such a comparison on physically deployed networks using the facilities of the FIT-IoTLab. The evaluation includes fully implementing an IIoT protocol stack based on MQTT in Contiki-NG. It comprises the integration of DSME as part of Contiki-NG’s software stack through OpenDSME, the only publicly available implementation of DSME. Results show that both protocols suit IIoT applications, particularly for data collection. The comparison between TSCH and DSME also includes an evaluation of distributed schedulers for both MAC modes and one autonomous scheduler for TSCH within a UDP protocol stack.","PeriodicalId":29764,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Internet of Things","volume":"40 1","pages":"1 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Internet of Things","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3595188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the Industrial Internet of Things (i.e., IIoT), the standardization of open technologies and protocols has achieved seamless data exchange between machines and other physical systems from different manufacturers. At the MAC sublayer, the industry-standard protocols IEEE 802.15.4 Time Slot Channel Hopping (TSCH) and Deterministic and Synchronous Multi-channel Extension (DSME) show promising properties for high adaptability and dynamically changing traffic. However, performance comparison between these MAC protocols rarely has gone beyond a simulation phase. This work presents the results of such a comparison on physically deployed networks using the facilities of the FIT-IoTLab. The evaluation includes fully implementing an IIoT protocol stack based on MQTT in Contiki-NG. It comprises the integration of DSME as part of Contiki-NG’s software stack through OpenDSME, the only publicly available implementation of DSME. Results show that both protocols suit IIoT applications, particularly for data collection. The comparison between TSCH and DSME also includes an evaluation of distributed schedulers for both MAC modes and one autonomous scheduler for TSCH within a UDP protocol stack.
IEEE 802.15.4 DSME和TSCH在工业应用物联网场景中的综合性能比较
在工业物联网(即IIoT)中,开放技术和协议的标准化实现了机器与来自不同制造商的其他物理系统之间的无缝数据交换。在MAC子层,行业标准协议IEEE 802.15.4时隙信道跳变(TSCH)和确定性和同步多信道扩展(DSME)显示出高适应性和动态变化流量的良好特性。然而,这些MAC协议之间的性能比较很少超出仿真阶段。这项工作展示了使用FIT-IoTLab设施对物理部署网络进行比较的结果。评估包括在Contiki-NG中完全实现基于MQTT的IIoT协议栈。它通过OpenDSME将DSME集成为Contiki-NG软件堆栈的一部分,OpenDSME是唯一公开可用的DSME实现。结果表明,这两种协议都适合工业物联网应用,特别是数据收集。TSCH和DSME之间的比较还包括对MAC模式的分布式调度器和UDP协议栈中TSCH的一个自治调度器的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信