Evaluation of Non-Medical Services’ Responsiveness Using a National Model: Patients’ Viewpoint

R. Askari, S. Rafiei, R. Montazerolfaraj, F. Sepaseh, A. Tafti, Mahboobeh Irany Nasab
{"title":"Evaluation of Non-Medical Services’ Responsiveness Using a National Model: Patients’ Viewpoint","authors":"R. Askari, S. Rafiei, R. Montazerolfaraj, F. Sepaseh, A. Tafti, Mahboobeh Irany Nasab","doi":"10.17795/BHS-41830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Responsiveness is the main indicator of high performance in every health system. This study was conducted to assess non-medical services’ responsiveness from patients’ viewpoint through applying a localized responsiveness model in Iran. \nMethods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study, conducted in three hospitals of Yazd province in 2015. To collect data, a standardized questionnaire was used and data were analyzed by SPSS 16 software package, through applying descriptive statistical tests, T-test, correlation and analysis of variance (ANOVA). \nResults: The study findings revealed that a mean score for responsiveness from patients’ viewpoint was 2.48 ± 0.26 at a public hospital, 2.14 ± 0.26 at a private and 2 ± 0.27 at a charity hospital representing an average level for hospitals under study. The highest and lowest mean scores among different aspects of responsiveness belonged to dignity (2.5 ± 0.36) and informed choice \n(1.9 ± 0.43). \nConclusions: Given that responsiveness was evaluated at an average level, appropriate policy interventions and necessary reforms are proposed to increase its status in under study hospitals. \nKeywords: Patient, Non-Medical Support Services, Responsiveness, Viewpoint","PeriodicalId":8849,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology and Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17795/BHS-41830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Responsiveness is the main indicator of high performance in every health system. This study was conducted to assess non-medical services’ responsiveness from patients’ viewpoint through applying a localized responsiveness model in Iran. Methods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study, conducted in three hospitals of Yazd province in 2015. To collect data, a standardized questionnaire was used and data were analyzed by SPSS 16 software package, through applying descriptive statistical tests, T-test, correlation and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: The study findings revealed that a mean score for responsiveness from patients’ viewpoint was 2.48 ± 0.26 at a public hospital, 2.14 ± 0.26 at a private and 2 ± 0.27 at a charity hospital representing an average level for hospitals under study. The highest and lowest mean scores among different aspects of responsiveness belonged to dignity (2.5 ± 0.36) and informed choice (1.9 ± 0.43). Conclusions: Given that responsiveness was evaluated at an average level, appropriate policy interventions and necessary reforms are proposed to increase its status in under study hospitals. Keywords: Patient, Non-Medical Support Services, Responsiveness, Viewpoint
基于国家模型的非医疗服务响应性评价:患者视角
背景:响应性是每个卫生系统高绩效的主要指标。本研究从患者的角度出发,通过在伊朗应用本地化反应性模型来评估非医疗服务的反应性。方法:这是一项描述性横断面研究,于2015年在亚兹德省的三家医院进行。采用标准化问卷进行数据收集,采用SPSS 16软件包对数据进行分析,采用描述性统计检验、t检验、相关分析和方差分析(ANOVA)。结果:研究结果显示,公立医院的患者反应性平均得分为2.48±0.26,私立医院为2.14±0.26,慈善医院为2±0.27,代表了研究医院的平均水平。反应性各方面平均得分最高和最低的分别是尊严(2.5±0.36)和知情选择(1.9±0.43)。结论:鉴于响应性评价为平均水平,建议采取适当的政策干预和必要的改革,以提高其在研究医院中的地位。关键词:患者、非医疗支持服务、响应性、观点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信