The Perspective of Turkey in the Post Occupancy Evaluation Studies

Sena Işıklar Bengi, A. Topraklı
{"title":"The Perspective of Turkey in the Post Occupancy Evaluation Studies","authors":"Sena Işıklar Bengi, A. Topraklı","doi":"10.3311/ppar.15318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From past to present, the evaluation of structures has been the subject of both academic studies and practices through different systematic methods. One of these methods is the \"Post Occupancy Evaluation\". The method, whose first implementations date back to the 1960s, enables to process hard-to-evaluate data that is based on the dynamic structure of the user. It focuses on detecting the gaps between user satisfaction and physical environment. POE provides advantages in certain subjects such as comprehending the relationship among the use, attitude, and evaluation of the building performance, and making conscious decisions about the future building designs. In this study, a review was conducted about the definition and advantages of the \"Post Occupancy Evaluation\" as well as its introduction into the literature and its place in the literature. Subsequently, progressing further, the studies of this model in Turkey were presented. Concerning the studies conducted since the evaluation was introduced into the academy in Turkey, the qualifications, objectives and types of buildings they focused on were cited. It was determined that the majority of the studies were conducted on several building types, and mainly focused on design evaluations, user evaluations, energy performance evaluations, and IEQ evaluations that are defined as the direct objectives of the POE studies. By evaluating the findings, the deficiencies were discovered in the implementation of the method in Turkey and the development of country-specific evaluation protocols, the importance of the evaluation method was emphasized, and the need to improve the deficiencies was stated.","PeriodicalId":33684,"journal":{"name":"Periodica Polytechnica Architecture","volume":"11 1","pages":"83-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodica Polytechnica Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3311/ppar.15318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

From past to present, the evaluation of structures has been the subject of both academic studies and practices through different systematic methods. One of these methods is the "Post Occupancy Evaluation". The method, whose first implementations date back to the 1960s, enables to process hard-to-evaluate data that is based on the dynamic structure of the user. It focuses on detecting the gaps between user satisfaction and physical environment. POE provides advantages in certain subjects such as comprehending the relationship among the use, attitude, and evaluation of the building performance, and making conscious decisions about the future building designs. In this study, a review was conducted about the definition and advantages of the "Post Occupancy Evaluation" as well as its introduction into the literature and its place in the literature. Subsequently, progressing further, the studies of this model in Turkey were presented. Concerning the studies conducted since the evaluation was introduced into the academy in Turkey, the qualifications, objectives and types of buildings they focused on were cited. It was determined that the majority of the studies were conducted on several building types, and mainly focused on design evaluations, user evaluations, energy performance evaluations, and IEQ evaluations that are defined as the direct objectives of the POE studies. By evaluating the findings, the deficiencies were discovered in the implementation of the method in Turkey and the development of country-specific evaluation protocols, the importance of the evaluation method was emphasized, and the need to improve the deficiencies was stated.
土耳其在占领后评价研究中的视角
从过去到现在,结构评价一直是学术研究和实践的主题,通过不同的系统方法。其中一种方法是“使用后评价”。该方法的首次实现可以追溯到20世纪60年代,它能够处理基于用户动态结构的难以评估的数据。它侧重于检测用户满意度和物理环境之间的差距。POE在理解建筑性能的使用、态度和评价之间的关系,以及对未来建筑设计做出有意识的决策等方面具有优势。本研究对“入住后评价”的定义、优势、文献介绍及在文献中的地位进行了综述。随后,进一步介绍了在土耳其对这一模式进行的研究。关于自土耳其学院引进评价以来所进行的研究,列举了它们所侧重的建筑物的资格、目标和类型。经确定,大多数研究是针对几种建筑类型进行的,主要集中于设计评价、用户评价、能源绩效评价和环境质量评价,这些被定义为环境评价项目研究的直接目标。通过评价调查结果,发现了在土耳其执行该方法和制定针对具体国家的评价议定书方面的不足之处,强调了评价方法的重要性,并指出需要改进这些不足之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信