Estudio comparativo entre abordaje abierto vs. percutáneo para la reducción y síntesis en fracturas intraarticulares desplazadas de calcáneo

Denise González Acuña, Isabel María Ruiz Hernández, Marina Sabater Jofre, Jaime Álvarez Lastra, María José Muñoz González, Javier Gascó Adrien
{"title":"Estudio comparativo entre abordaje abierto vs. percutáneo para la reducción y síntesis en fracturas intraarticulares desplazadas de calcáneo","authors":"Denise González Acuña, Isabel María Ruiz Hernández, Marina Sabater Jofre, Jaime Álvarez Lastra, María José Muñoz González, Javier Gascó Adrien","doi":"10.24129/j.rpt.3701.fs2304013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"pa-ABSTRACT Comparative study between open vs . percutaneous approach for reduction and fixation in displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures Intra-articular calcaneal fractures (IACF) are associated with a high rate of short and long term complications. The most frequent mechanism is the fall from height (high energy), also conditioning an important soft tissue involvement. Surgical treatment by open reduction through an extended lateral approach and internal fixation with a lateral plate is still considered the “gold standard”. However, in many cases, this procedure requires an initial delay in surgical treatment to allow improvement of the skin condition and carries a high risk of skin and surgical incision complications. In recent years, techniques using less invasive approaches have become more popular. The aim of our study was to compare the incidence of complications in fractures treated by lateral approach and plate fixation vs . percutaneous reduction and synthesis with screws. As secondary objectives, we also compared the clinical and radiological results between both approaches and described the surgical technique of percu-Vol","PeriodicalId":101106,"journal":{"name":"Revista del Pie y Tobillo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista del Pie y Tobillo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24129/j.rpt.3701.fs2304013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

pa-ABSTRACT Comparative study between open vs . percutaneous approach for reduction and fixation in displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures Intra-articular calcaneal fractures (IACF) are associated with a high rate of short and long term complications. The most frequent mechanism is the fall from height (high energy), also conditioning an important soft tissue involvement. Surgical treatment by open reduction through an extended lateral approach and internal fixation with a lateral plate is still considered the “gold standard”. However, in many cases, this procedure requires an initial delay in surgical treatment to allow improvement of the skin condition and carries a high risk of skin and surgical incision complications. In recent years, techniques using less invasive approaches have become more popular. The aim of our study was to compare the incidence of complications in fractures treated by lateral approach and plate fixation vs . percutaneous reduction and synthesis with screws. As secondary objectives, we also compared the clinical and radiological results between both approaches and described the surgical technique of percu-Vol
开放性与经皮入路对跟骨移位关节内骨折复位合成的比较研究
开放与开放的比较研究。关节内跟骨骨折(IACF)具有较高的短期和长期并发症发生率。最常见的机制是从高处坠落(高能量),也调节了重要的软组织受累。通过扩展外侧入路切开复位和外侧钢板内固定的手术治疗仍被认为是“金标准”。然而,在许多情况下,这种方法需要延迟手术治疗以改善皮肤状况,并且有很高的皮肤和手术切口并发症的风险。近年来,采用较少侵入性方法的技术变得越来越流行。我们研究的目的是比较外侧入路和钢板内固定治疗骨折并发症的发生率。经皮螺钉复位和合成。作为次要目的,我们还比较了两种入路的临床和放射学结果,并描述了percu-Vol的手术技术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信