Grammaticalization and subjectification in the semantic domain of possibility in Kirundi (Bantu, JD62)

IF 0.3 3区 文学
K. Bostoen, Ferdinand Mberamihigo, G. D. Schryver
{"title":"Grammaticalization and subjectification in the semantic domain of possibility in Kirundi (Bantu, JD62)","authors":"K. Bostoen, Ferdinand Mberamihigo, G. D. Schryver","doi":"10.3406/AFLIN.2012.1005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a first systematic study of the expression of possibility in Kirundi, more specifically of its verbal markers. Possibility is traditionally seen as one of the core components of the semantic domain of modality. The onomasiological approach of this modal sub‑domain has resulted in the identification of four verbal potential markers, i.e., the auxiliaries ‑bâsh‑ and ‑shobor‑, the semi‑auxiliary ‑shobok‑, and the TAM affix ‑oo‑. These four markers of possibility manifest different degrees of grammaticalization along the full verb > auxiliary > affix cline. Grammaticalization in the structural domain seems to be correlated with semantic change, both within and beyond the semantic domain of possibility. The related verbs ‑shobor‑ and ‑shobok‑, which have no or little remaining lexical uses, cover the entire semantic domain of possibility in contrast to ‑bâsh‑ which has still clearly distinct lexical uses (‘to be active, to be healthy’) and only conveys participant‑inherent possibility. The inflectional affix ‑oo‑, covering the entire domain of possibility and having developed other modal and non‑modal meanings, manifests the most advanced semantic generalization. Moreover, ‑oo‑ underwent the strongest subjectification within the semantic domain of possibility and even developed different intersubjective uses. Hence, the most grammaticalized marker of possibility in Kirundi not only underwent the strongest semantic generalization, but its meaning is also the most (inter)subjectified.","PeriodicalId":41483,"journal":{"name":"Africana Linguistica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africana Linguistica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/AFLIN.2012.1005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

This article is a first systematic study of the expression of possibility in Kirundi, more specifically of its verbal markers. Possibility is traditionally seen as one of the core components of the semantic domain of modality. The onomasiological approach of this modal sub‑domain has resulted in the identification of four verbal potential markers, i.e., the auxiliaries ‑bâsh‑ and ‑shobor‑, the semi‑auxiliary ‑shobok‑, and the TAM affix ‑oo‑. These four markers of possibility manifest different degrees of grammaticalization along the full verb > auxiliary > affix cline. Grammaticalization in the structural domain seems to be correlated with semantic change, both within and beyond the semantic domain of possibility. The related verbs ‑shobor‑ and ‑shobok‑, which have no or little remaining lexical uses, cover the entire semantic domain of possibility in contrast to ‑bâsh‑ which has still clearly distinct lexical uses (‘to be active, to be healthy’) and only conveys participant‑inherent possibility. The inflectional affix ‑oo‑, covering the entire domain of possibility and having developed other modal and non‑modal meanings, manifests the most advanced semantic generalization. Moreover, ‑oo‑ underwent the strongest subjectification within the semantic domain of possibility and even developed different intersubjective uses. Hence, the most grammaticalized marker of possibility in Kirundi not only underwent the strongest semantic generalization, but its meaning is also the most (inter)subjectified.
基隆迪语可能性语义域的语法化和主体化(班图语,JD62)
本文是对基隆迪语中可能性表达的第一次系统研究,更具体地说,是对其言语标记的研究。可能性传统上被认为是情态语义域的核心组成部分之一。这一模态子域的拟声学方法导致了四种言语潜在标记的识别,即助语- b sh -和- shobor -,半助语- shobok -和TAM词缀- oo -。这四种可能性标记沿着动词完整>助词>词缀cline表现出不同程度的语法化。结构域的语法化似乎与可能性语义域内外的语义变化有关。相关的动词- shobor -和- shobok -几乎没有或几乎没有剩余的词汇用途,它们涵盖了可能性的整个语义领域,而- b sh -仍然有明显不同的词汇用途(“活跃的,健康的”),只传达参与者固有的可能性。屈折词缀- oo -涵盖了整个可能性域,并发展了其他模态和非模态意义,体现了最高级的语义概括。此外,在可能性的语义领域中,“o”经历了最强烈的主体化,甚至发展了不同的主体间用法。因此,基隆迪语中语法化程度最高的可能性标记不仅语义泛化程度最高,而且其意义也最(相互)主体化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信