EFFICACY OF DIGITAL MANIPULATION OF THYROID CARTILAGE, FLUENCY SHAPING THERAPY AND COMBINATION OF BOTH IN TREATMENT OF STUTTERING SEVERITY: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

N. Khan, Raheela Khatoon, H. Saleem, Humaira Shamim Kiani, R. Butt
{"title":"EFFICACY OF DIGITAL MANIPULATION OF THYROID CARTILAGE, FLUENCY SHAPING THERAPY AND COMBINATION OF BOTH IN TREATMENT OF STUTTERING SEVERITY: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL","authors":"N. Khan, Raheela Khatoon, H. Saleem, Humaira Shamim Kiani, R. Butt","doi":"10.52567/trj.v6i02.178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The stuttering is manifested by disruption in normal speech flow and fluency that also disturbs social and emotional wellbeing. There is immediate need of rehabilitation for the improvement of fluency and reduce the severity of stuttering.Objective:To compare the digital manipulation of thyroid cartilage (DMTC), fluency shaping therapy (FST) and combination of DMTC and FST for improving severity in stuttering patients. Material and Method: A randomized clinical trial was conducted at National Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine. The patients were enrolled through non-probability, convenient sampling technique. The participants were randomly allocated into three equal groups (n=10): DMTC group, FST group and combination of both. The Scale of Rating Severity of Stuttering (SRSS) was used to assess the severity level at baseline, 2ndweek, 4thweek, 8thweek and 12thweek of intervention.Results: The mean age of DMTC, FST and combination group was, 22.25 ±3.33 years, 21.65±3.36 and 21.35±3.76 years respectively. Friedman with post hoc test revealed significant improvement (p<0.05) in all groups but combination group had showed better outcome than single DMTC and FST intervention. A Kruskal-Wallis H test showed that there was no significant difference (p≥0.05) among DMTC, FST and Combination group from baseline to 8thweeks of training, but significant difference {X2(2) =5.897, p<0.014} was observed after 12thweek of training among the groups. The post hoc test showed that the combination group was more significantly improved as compared to DMTC group {MR=9.10 ver. MR=17.71, p=0.012} but not significant difference between difference between combination and FST group (p=0.317) as well as DMTC and FST group (p=0.619) regarding severity of stuttering. Conclusion: It is concluded that combination of digital manipulation of thyroid cartilage and fluency shaping therapy were more beneficial for improving fluency in stuttering patients. Key words:Digital manipulationtherapy,fluency shaping therapy, stammering, stuttering.","PeriodicalId":90985,"journal":{"name":"The open rehabilitation journal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open rehabilitation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52567/trj.v6i02.178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The stuttering is manifested by disruption in normal speech flow and fluency that also disturbs social and emotional wellbeing. There is immediate need of rehabilitation for the improvement of fluency and reduce the severity of stuttering.Objective:To compare the digital manipulation of thyroid cartilage (DMTC), fluency shaping therapy (FST) and combination of DMTC and FST for improving severity in stuttering patients. Material and Method: A randomized clinical trial was conducted at National Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine. The patients were enrolled through non-probability, convenient sampling technique. The participants were randomly allocated into three equal groups (n=10): DMTC group, FST group and combination of both. The Scale of Rating Severity of Stuttering (SRSS) was used to assess the severity level at baseline, 2ndweek, 4thweek, 8thweek and 12thweek of intervention.Results: The mean age of DMTC, FST and combination group was, 22.25 ±3.33 years, 21.65±3.36 and 21.35±3.76 years respectively. Friedman with post hoc test revealed significant improvement (p<0.05) in all groups but combination group had showed better outcome than single DMTC and FST intervention. A Kruskal-Wallis H test showed that there was no significant difference (p≥0.05) among DMTC, FST and Combination group from baseline to 8thweeks of training, but significant difference {X2(2) =5.897, p<0.014} was observed after 12thweek of training among the groups. The post hoc test showed that the combination group was more significantly improved as compared to DMTC group {MR=9.10 ver. MR=17.71, p=0.012} but not significant difference between difference between combination and FST group (p=0.317) as well as DMTC and FST group (p=0.619) regarding severity of stuttering. Conclusion: It is concluded that combination of digital manipulation of thyroid cartilage and fluency shaping therapy were more beneficial for improving fluency in stuttering patients. Key words:Digital manipulationtherapy,fluency shaping therapy, stammering, stuttering.
甲状腺软骨数字化手法、流畅性塑造疗法及两者结合治疗重度口吃的随机临床试验
背景:口吃表现为正常的语言流动和流畅性中断,也会扰乱社会和情感健康。迫切需要康复,以提高流利程度和减轻口吃的严重程度。目的:比较数字手法甲状软骨(DMTC)、流畅性塑造疗法(FST)以及DMTC与FST联合治疗对改善口吃患者严重程度的作用。材料与方法:在国立康复医学研究所进行随机临床试验。患者采用非概率、方便抽样技术入组。参与者随机分为三组(n=10): DMTC组、FST组和两者联合组。采用口吃严重程度评定量表(SRSS)评估干预后基线、干预后第2周、干预后第4周、干预后第8周、干预后第12周的严重程度。结果:DMTC组、FST组和联合组的平均年龄分别为22.25±3.33岁、21.65±3.36岁和21.35±3.76岁。经事后检验,两组患者的预后均有显著改善(p<0.05),但联合组的预后优于单次DMTC和FST干预。Kruskal-Wallis H检验显示,DMTC组、FST组和联合组从基线到训练第8周,差异无统计学意义(p≥0.05),但在训练第12周时,组间差异有统计学意义(X2(2) =5.897, p<0.014)。事后检验显示,与DMTC组相比,联合用药组的改善更为显著(MR=9.10)。MR=17.71, p=0.012},但组合组与FST组、DMTC组与FST组在口吃严重程度上差异无统计学意义(p=0.317),差异无统计学意义(p=0.619)。结论:结合甲状腺软骨指法和流利度塑造疗法对提高口吃患者的流利度更有利。关键词:数字手法疗法,流利度塑造疗法,结巴,口吃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信