{"title":"Grounding identity in existence facts: a reply to Wilhelm","authors":"Neil Mehta","doi":"10.1093/analys/anad003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n What grounds facts of the form <x= x>? One promising answer is: facts of the form <xexists>. A different promising answer is: xitself. Isaac Wilhelm has recently argued that the second answer is superior to the first. In this paper, I rebut his argument.","PeriodicalId":82310,"journal":{"name":"Philosophic research and analysis","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophic research and analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anad003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
What grounds facts of the form ? One promising answer is: facts of the form . A different promising answer is: xitself. Isaac Wilhelm has recently argued that the second answer is superior to the first. In this paper, I rebut his argument.