Clinical signs of the quality level of fixed dentures in the process of use and rationale for feasibility of their replacement

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
B. Malanyak, A. Kordiyak
{"title":"Clinical signs of the quality level of fixed dentures in the process of use and rationale for feasibility of their replacement","authors":"B. Malanyak, A. Kordiyak","doi":"10.26641/2307-0404.2023.2.283359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing requirements for the quality of dental care necessitates expert evaluation of dental prostheses. Therefore, on the way to improve the structure and process of providing dental care, it is important to analyze the primary data of its results in quantitative and qualitative terms. The purpose of this work is to clarify the content and results of consulting care by analyzing clinically important indicators of the quality of fixed dentures that determine their applicability for further use. Among the 410 patients aged 35-81 examined for damage to abutment teeth and periodontal tissues, unsatisfactory condition of crowns and bridges, the 1st subgroup included 76 (18.5%) persons who sought counseling on their own initiative and the 2nd subgroup – 334 (81.5%) persons with referrals from other medical institutions. Quality indicators of 759 artificial crowns and 803 bridges were determined (K08.5 – unsatisfactory restoration of teeth) in the early (up to 24 months) and remote (more than 24 months of use) periods of observation using a modified index of clinical and technological quality. In patients of both groups in the early observation period 67 crowns and 101 bridges (all signs – 253), and in the remote period – 692 crowns and 702 bridges (3804 signs) of low quality were revealed. Quality index of these structures in the early and remote periods of observation was 0,71 versus 0,36 (p<0.05) and 0.64 versus 0.37 respectively (p<0.05). In 71 (93.4%) patients of the 1st group grounds for replacement of 292 out of 327 (89.3%), and in 238 (71.3%) patients of the 2nd group – 827 (67.0%) out of 1235 fixed partial dentures were found. Thus, expert assessment of the quality of dental care is an integral part of ensuring the predicted results of prosthetic treatment. The proposed method of assessing the clinical and technological quality of fixed dentures makes it possible to determine their suitability or unsuitability for further use.","PeriodicalId":41059,"journal":{"name":"Medical Perspectives-Medicni Perspektivi","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Perspectives-Medicni Perspektivi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2023.2.283359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing requirements for the quality of dental care necessitates expert evaluation of dental prostheses. Therefore, on the way to improve the structure and process of providing dental care, it is important to analyze the primary data of its results in quantitative and qualitative terms. The purpose of this work is to clarify the content and results of consulting care by analyzing clinically important indicators of the quality of fixed dentures that determine their applicability for further use. Among the 410 patients aged 35-81 examined for damage to abutment teeth and periodontal tissues, unsatisfactory condition of crowns and bridges, the 1st subgroup included 76 (18.5%) persons who sought counseling on their own initiative and the 2nd subgroup – 334 (81.5%) persons with referrals from other medical institutions. Quality indicators of 759 artificial crowns and 803 bridges were determined (K08.5 – unsatisfactory restoration of teeth) in the early (up to 24 months) and remote (more than 24 months of use) periods of observation using a modified index of clinical and technological quality. In patients of both groups in the early observation period 67 crowns and 101 bridges (all signs – 253), and in the remote period – 692 crowns and 702 bridges (3804 signs) of low quality were revealed. Quality index of these structures in the early and remote periods of observation was 0,71 versus 0,36 (p<0.05) and 0.64 versus 0.37 respectively (p<0.05). In 71 (93.4%) patients of the 1st group grounds for replacement of 292 out of 327 (89.3%), and in 238 (71.3%) patients of the 2nd group – 827 (67.0%) out of 1235 fixed partial dentures were found. Thus, expert assessment of the quality of dental care is an integral part of ensuring the predicted results of prosthetic treatment. The proposed method of assessing the clinical and technological quality of fixed dentures makes it possible to determine their suitability or unsuitability for further use.
固定义齿在使用过程中的临床表现及质量水平,为其更换的可行性提供依据
对牙科护理质量日益增长的要求需要对牙科修复体进行专家评估。因此,在改善牙科保健的结构和流程的过程中,对其结果的原始数据进行定量和定性分析是很重要的。本工作的目的是通过分析临床上固定义齿质量的重要指标来明确咨询护理的内容和结果,这些指标决定了固定义齿进一步使用的适用性。在410例35 ~ 81岁的基牙及牙周组织损伤、牙冠、牙桥不良患者中,第1亚组有76人(18.5%)主动咨询,第2亚组有334人(81.5%)转诊至其他医疗机构。采用改良的临床和技术质量指标,确定759个人工冠和803个人工桥的早期(使用24个月以内)和后期(使用24个月以上)的质量指标(K08.5—牙齿修复不满意)。两组患者在早期观察期共发现冠、桥67个(全部征象253个),在后期观察期发现低质量冠、桥692个(3804个)。观察前期和后期结构质量指数分别为0.71比0.36 (p<0.05)和0.64比0.37 (p<0.05)。第一组71例(93.4%)患者327例(89.3%)中发现292例(93.4%)有理由更换;第二组238例(71.3%)患者1235例中发现827例(67.0%)有理由更换固定局部义齿。因此,牙科护理质量的专家评估是确保假肢治疗预测结果的一个组成部分。所提出的评估固定义齿临床和技术质量的方法使确定其是否适合进一步使用成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Perspectives-Medicni Perspektivi
Medical Perspectives-Medicni Perspektivi MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信