Over Triage: Injury Classification Mistake or Hindsight Bias?

Richard Simonson, J. Keebler, Rosemarie Fernandez, E. Lazzara, Alex Chaparro
{"title":"Over Triage: Injury Classification Mistake or Hindsight Bias?","authors":"Richard Simonson, J. Keebler, Rosemarie Fernandez, E. Lazzara, Alex Chaparro","doi":"10.1177/2327857922111001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patient triage is a critical stage in providing patients with the appropriate level of care required. Multiple metrics are considered in determining appropriate triage at the time of assessment. Due to the complexity of healthcare intervention, patients are often under- or over-triaged. Initiatives to reduce incorrect triages have been developed and implemented. These initiatives, however, may be based on hindsight bias and subsequently result in inaccurate assessments of triage accuracy and lead to improper triage-based education initiatives. This submission proposes the application of the SEIPS framework as a method of mitigating challenges introduced in the triage accuracy assessments due to this potential hindsight bias.","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"27 1","pages":"7 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857922111001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient triage is a critical stage in providing patients with the appropriate level of care required. Multiple metrics are considered in determining appropriate triage at the time of assessment. Due to the complexity of healthcare intervention, patients are often under- or over-triaged. Initiatives to reduce incorrect triages have been developed and implemented. These initiatives, however, may be based on hindsight bias and subsequently result in inaccurate assessments of triage accuracy and lead to improper triage-based education initiatives. This submission proposes the application of the SEIPS framework as a method of mitigating challenges introduced in the triage accuracy assessments due to this potential hindsight bias.
伤情分类:损伤分类错误还是后见之明?
患者分诊是为患者提供所需的适当护理水平的关键阶段。在评估时,在确定适当的分类时要考虑多个指标。由于医疗干预的复杂性,患者往往是不足或过度分类。已经制定和实施了减少错误分类的措施。然而,这些举措可能基于后见之明的偏见,随后导致对分诊准确性的不准确评估,并导致不适当的基于分诊的教育举措。本意见书建议应用SEIPS框架,作为减轻因这种潜在的后见之明偏见而在分诊准确性评估中引入的挑战的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信