What research should be done in gynaecological endoscopy? A national questionnaire survey of members of the British Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy

T. Justin Clark, Deepa Mahajan, Ponnamal Sunder, Tracy Bingham, Khalid S. Khan, Janesh K. Gupta
{"title":"What research should be done in gynaecological endoscopy? A national questionnaire survey of members of the British Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy","authors":"T. Justin Clark,&nbsp;Deepa Mahajan,&nbsp;Ponnamal Sunder,&nbsp;Tracy Bingham,&nbsp;Khalid S. Khan,&nbsp;Janesh K. Gupta","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00465.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To determine current research activity and establish views on the direction of future research in gynaecological endoscopy.</p><p>A self-administered structured questionnaire was posted to 389 UK gynaecologists to enquire about current research activity and collect their views on future research within gynaecological endoscopy.</p><p>Members of the British Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE).</p><p>The postal questionnaire was returned by 100 BSGE members (26% response rate) and of these respondents, 47 (47%) were actively involved in research. The majority of respondents (99/100, 99%), believed that the BSGE should play a proactive role in directing future research in gynaecological endoscopy. Therapeutic laparoscopy was the area of gynaecological endoscopy identified most frequently (80/100, 80%) for future study. Within this area, 22/80 (28%) specified the need for studies into laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis, especially comparative studies between ablative and excisional treatment (15/22, 68%).</p><p>There is a substantial commitment to research in gynaecological endoscopy by BSGE members who responded to the survey. The BSGE should play a proactive role in defining its research remit in health technology assessment. Future research requiring priority should focus on determining the effectiveness of laparoscopic methods of treatment for endometriosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 5-6","pages":"297-301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00465.x","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00465.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

To determine current research activity and establish views on the direction of future research in gynaecological endoscopy.

A self-administered structured questionnaire was posted to 389 UK gynaecologists to enquire about current research activity and collect their views on future research within gynaecological endoscopy.

Members of the British Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE).

The postal questionnaire was returned by 100 BSGE members (26% response rate) and of these respondents, 47 (47%) were actively involved in research. The majority of respondents (99/100, 99%), believed that the BSGE should play a proactive role in directing future research in gynaecological endoscopy. Therapeutic laparoscopy was the area of gynaecological endoscopy identified most frequently (80/100, 80%) for future study. Within this area, 22/80 (28%) specified the need for studies into laparoscopic treatment of endometriosis, especially comparative studies between ablative and excisional treatment (15/22, 68%).

There is a substantial commitment to research in gynaecological endoscopy by BSGE members who responded to the survey. The BSGE should play a proactive role in defining its research remit in health technology assessment. Future research requiring priority should focus on determining the effectiveness of laparoscopic methods of treatment for endometriosis.

妇科内窥镜检查应做哪些研究?一项针对英国妇科内镜学会成员的全国性问卷调查
确定目前的研究活动,并对妇科内窥镜的未来研究方向提出意见。一份自我管理的结构化问卷发给了389名英国妇科医生,询问他们目前的研究活动,并收集他们对妇科内窥镜未来研究的看法。英国妇科内镜学会(BSGE)成员。邮寄问卷由100名BSGE成员(26%回复率)返回,其中47名(47%)积极参与研究。大多数受访者(99/ 100,99%)认为BSGE应在指导妇科内窥镜的未来研究中发挥积极作用。治疗性腹腔镜是妇科内窥镜检查中最常见的领域(80/ 100,80%),用于未来的研究。在这一领域,22/80(28%)指出需要研究腹腔镜治疗子宫内膜异位症,特别是消融和切除治疗之间的比较研究(15/22,68%)。参与调查的BSGE成员对妇科内窥镜检查的研究作出了实质性的承诺。BSGE应在确定其在卫生技术评估方面的研究职责方面发挥积极作用。未来需要优先考虑的研究应该集中在确定腹腔镜方法治疗子宫内膜异位症的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信