Influence of root width and dentin wall thickness evaluated by endoscopy upon the outcome of periapical surgery. A cohort study

Pablo Glera-Suarez, Antonio Pallarés-Serrano, David Soto-Peñaloza, Beatriz Tarazona-Álvarez, M. Peñarrocha-Diago, D. Peñarrocha-Oltra
{"title":"Influence of root width and dentin wall thickness evaluated by endoscopy upon the outcome of periapical surgery. A cohort study","authors":"Pablo Glera-Suarez, Antonio Pallarés-Serrano, David Soto-Peñaloza, Beatriz Tarazona-Álvarez, M. Peñarrocha-Diago, D. Peñarrocha-Oltra","doi":"10.4317/medoral.25314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background An analysis was made of the correlation between root width, the thickness of the remaining dentinal wall as determined by endoscopy, and the outcome of periapical surgery. Material and Methods A retrospective cohort study was carried out involving patients subjected to periapical surgery between 2017 and 2019 at the University of Valencia (Valencia, Spain). One year after surgery, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to evaluate healing against the preoperative volumes. The maximum root width was measured on the postoperative CBCT scan at the apical section of the treated root. This measurement was transferred to the intraoperative endoscopic image, where the minimum root width, peripheral dentin thickness, and minimum dentin thickness were recorded. Root measurements, and the position (maxillary or mandibular) and type of tooth (roots of incisors, canines, premolars or molars) were further correlated to periapical surgery outcome. Results A total of 51 patients, comprising 52 teeth and 62 roots, were included in the study. The mean measurements were: maximum root width (4.13±0.84 mm), minimum root width (2.46±0.72 mm), peripheral dentin thickness (0.77±0.2 mm) and minimum dentin thickness (0.4±0.2 mm). The success rate was 82.2%. Premolar roots showed a greater minimum dentin thickness (0.58±0.25 mm) (p<0.003) than incisor roots. No significant association was found between the different measurements and the healing rate at one year, though the roots that failed to heal showed smaller minimum dentin thickness values than the roots that healed correctly. The position and type of tooth did not influence healing outcome. Conclusions The root width and thickness of the remaining dentin wall did not significantly influence healing. However, the roots that failed to heal showed smaller minimum dentin thickness values than the roots that healed correctly. Key words:Endodontic surgery, endoscope, dentin walls.","PeriodicalId":18367,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal","volume":"70 1","pages":"e383 - e391"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.25314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background An analysis was made of the correlation between root width, the thickness of the remaining dentinal wall as determined by endoscopy, and the outcome of periapical surgery. Material and Methods A retrospective cohort study was carried out involving patients subjected to periapical surgery between 2017 and 2019 at the University of Valencia (Valencia, Spain). One year after surgery, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to evaluate healing against the preoperative volumes. The maximum root width was measured on the postoperative CBCT scan at the apical section of the treated root. This measurement was transferred to the intraoperative endoscopic image, where the minimum root width, peripheral dentin thickness, and minimum dentin thickness were recorded. Root measurements, and the position (maxillary or mandibular) and type of tooth (roots of incisors, canines, premolars or molars) were further correlated to periapical surgery outcome. Results A total of 51 patients, comprising 52 teeth and 62 roots, were included in the study. The mean measurements were: maximum root width (4.13±0.84 mm), minimum root width (2.46±0.72 mm), peripheral dentin thickness (0.77±0.2 mm) and minimum dentin thickness (0.4±0.2 mm). The success rate was 82.2%. Premolar roots showed a greater minimum dentin thickness (0.58±0.25 mm) (p<0.003) than incisor roots. No significant association was found between the different measurements and the healing rate at one year, though the roots that failed to heal showed smaller minimum dentin thickness values than the roots that healed correctly. The position and type of tooth did not influence healing outcome. Conclusions The root width and thickness of the remaining dentin wall did not significantly influence healing. However, the roots that failed to heal showed smaller minimum dentin thickness values than the roots that healed correctly. Key words:Endodontic surgery, endoscope, dentin walls.
内窥镜评估牙根宽度和牙本质壁厚对根尖周围手术结果的影响。队列研究
本研究分析了根宽、内窥镜测定的剩余牙本质壁厚度与根尖周手术结果的相关性。材料与方法回顾性队列研究纳入2017年至2019年在西班牙瓦伦西亚大学(University of Valencia, Spain)接受根尖周围手术的患者。手术后一年,锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)用于评估愈合与术前体积。术后CBCT扫描在治疗根的根尖部分测量最大根宽。测量结果被转移到术中内镜图像中,记录最小牙根宽度、外周牙本质厚度和最小牙本质厚度。牙根测量、位置(上颌或下颌)和牙齿类型(门牙根、犬牙根、前磨牙根或磨牙根)与根尖周手术结果进一步相关。结果共纳入51例患者,包括52颗牙和62根。平均测量值为:最大根宽(4.13±0.84 mm)、最小根宽(2.46±0.72 mm)、外周牙本质厚度(0.77±0.2 mm)和最小牙本质厚度(0.4±0.2 mm)。成功率为82.2%。前磨牙根最小牙本质厚度(0.58±0.25 mm)大于切牙根(p<0.003)。不同的测量值与一年的愈合率之间没有明显的联系,尽管愈合失败的根比愈合正确的根显示出更小的牙本质最小厚度值。牙齿的位置和类型对愈合结果没有影响。结论牙根宽度和剩余牙本质壁厚度对牙本质愈合无显著影响。然而,未愈合的牙根的最小牙本质厚度值比愈合正确的牙根小。关键词:牙髓外科,内窥镜,牙本质壁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信