Eurasian Union: Overcoming Institutional Vacuum

Q3 Social Sciences
Gasparyan Gevorg, Asif Amin
{"title":"Eurasian Union: Overcoming Institutional Vacuum","authors":"Gasparyan Gevorg, Asif Amin","doi":"10.54418/ca-89.158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relations among the states of the Post-Soviet region had characterized predominantly by bilateral regulations rather than multilateralism. Russia appeared to be at the center of relations while the other nations had little economic, political, or military ties with post soviet states. The institutions created in the Post-Soviet space turned fragile from regional integrity, conflict management, and further development. When it came to the institutional preferences of the Post-Soviet countries, they were very diverse, given the willingness of extra-regional organizations such as the EU, NATO, and others to penetrate the region. Thus, the regional states had little to do together, let alone create a high-level regional organization, except for their close ties with Russia. Moreover, in its turn, Russia relied on regulating its relations with regional states on a bilateral basis. Then, the central puzzle is how to explain the emerging multilateralism in the form of the Eurasian Economic Union, considering the bilateralism between the states of the Post-Soviet region? We argue that the Eurasian Union is designed to overcome the institutional vacuum in the Post-Soviet region to reduce the regional countries' institutional manoeuvrability and maintain the region's geopolitical integrity by managing high interdependence between regional states.","PeriodicalId":53489,"journal":{"name":"Central Asia and the Caucasus","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Asia and the Caucasus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54418/ca-89.158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relations among the states of the Post-Soviet region had characterized predominantly by bilateral regulations rather than multilateralism. Russia appeared to be at the center of relations while the other nations had little economic, political, or military ties with post soviet states. The institutions created in the Post-Soviet space turned fragile from regional integrity, conflict management, and further development. When it came to the institutional preferences of the Post-Soviet countries, they were very diverse, given the willingness of extra-regional organizations such as the EU, NATO, and others to penetrate the region. Thus, the regional states had little to do together, let alone create a high-level regional organization, except for their close ties with Russia. Moreover, in its turn, Russia relied on regulating its relations with regional states on a bilateral basis. Then, the central puzzle is how to explain the emerging multilateralism in the form of the Eurasian Economic Union, considering the bilateralism between the states of the Post-Soviet region? We argue that the Eurasian Union is designed to overcome the institutional vacuum in the Post-Soviet region to reduce the regional countries' institutional manoeuvrability and maintain the region's geopolitical integrity by managing high interdependence between regional states.
欧亚联盟:克服制度真空
后苏联地区国家间关系的主要特点是双边规则,而不是多边主义。俄罗斯似乎处于关系的中心,而其他国家与后苏联国家几乎没有经济、政治或军事联系。后苏联时代建立的机构在区域完整、冲突管理和进一步发展方面变得脆弱。当谈到后苏联国家的制度偏好时,考虑到欧盟、北约等地区外组织渗透该地区的意愿,它们的制度偏好非常多样化。因此,除了与俄罗斯的密切联系外,该地区国家几乎没有什么合作,更不用说创建一个高级别的地区组织了。此外,反过来,俄罗斯依赖于在双边基础上调节与地区国家的关系。那么,核心难题是,考虑到后苏联地区国家之间的双边主义,如何解释以欧亚经济联盟形式出现的多边主义?我们认为,欧亚联盟旨在克服后苏联地区的制度真空,通过管理地区国家之间的高度相互依存,减少地区国家的制度可操作性,并保持该地区的地缘政治完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central Asia and the Caucasus
Central Asia and the Caucasus Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信