Comparison of the results of anterior chamber depth determinated with various instruments

Chunli Zhao
{"title":"Comparison of the results of anterior chamber depth determinated with various instruments","authors":"Chunli Zhao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1477.2020.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the difference, relevances and consistencies of the results of anterior chamber depth determinated with UBM, A scan ultrasonography, Orbscan, IOL Master 700 and IOL Master 5.0. \n \n \nMethods \nTotal of 126 eyes of 63 patients from Jan.2018 to Mar.2018 in outpatient department of Zhengzhou Municipal Second People’s Hospital were sellected. There were 60 eyes of 30 males and 66 eyes of 33 females.The age ranged from 19 to 71 years, with average of (30.13±10.73)years. The anterior chamber depth were determinated with UBM, A scan ultrasonography, Orbscan, IOL Master 700 and IOL Master5.0. \n \n \nResults \nThe average anterior chamber depth with UBM, A scan ultrasonography, Orbscan, IOL Master 700 and IOL Master 5.0 were (3.08±0.29), (3.11±0.35), (2.98±0.28), (3.07±0.28) and(3.46±0.36)mm, respectively.The differences were statistically significant among five groups(F=16.422, P=0.000). The differences were not statistically significant among the four methods except IOL Master 5.0(P=0.160). There were linear correlations among five groups(Pall=0.000)and good consistences. \n \n \nConclusion \nThere are good consistencies and relevances of the anterior chamber depth with UBM, A scan ultrasonography, Orbscan, IOL Master 700 and IOL Master 5.0. The anterior chamber depth determinated with IOL Master 5.0 are higher than that with other methods. \n \n \nKey words: \nDepth, anterion chamber; UBM; A scan ultrasocography; Orbscan; IOL Master 700; IOL Master 5.0","PeriodicalId":10126,"journal":{"name":"中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.2095-1477.2020.01.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To compare the difference, relevances and consistencies of the results of anterior chamber depth determinated with UBM, A scan ultrasonography, Orbscan, IOL Master 700 and IOL Master 5.0. Methods Total of 126 eyes of 63 patients from Jan.2018 to Mar.2018 in outpatient department of Zhengzhou Municipal Second People’s Hospital were sellected. There were 60 eyes of 30 males and 66 eyes of 33 females.The age ranged from 19 to 71 years, with average of (30.13±10.73)years. The anterior chamber depth were determinated with UBM, A scan ultrasonography, Orbscan, IOL Master 700 and IOL Master5.0. Results The average anterior chamber depth with UBM, A scan ultrasonography, Orbscan, IOL Master 700 and IOL Master 5.0 were (3.08±0.29), (3.11±0.35), (2.98±0.28), (3.07±0.28) and(3.46±0.36)mm, respectively.The differences were statistically significant among five groups(F=16.422, P=0.000). The differences were not statistically significant among the four methods except IOL Master 5.0(P=0.160). There were linear correlations among five groups(Pall=0.000)and good consistences. Conclusion There are good consistencies and relevances of the anterior chamber depth with UBM, A scan ultrasonography, Orbscan, IOL Master 700 and IOL Master 5.0. The anterior chamber depth determinated with IOL Master 5.0 are higher than that with other methods. Key words: Depth, anterion chamber; UBM; A scan ultrasocography; Orbscan; IOL Master 700; IOL Master 5.0
不同仪器测定前房深度结果的比较
目的比较UBM、A超、Orbscan、IOL Master 700和IOL Master 5.0测定前房深度结果的差异、相关性和一致性。方法选取郑州市第二人民医院门诊2018年1月至2018年3月收治的63例患者126眼。30名男性有60只眼睛,33名女性有66只眼睛。年龄19 ~ 71岁,平均(30.13±10.73)岁。采用UBM、A超、Orbscan、IOL Master 700、IOL Master5.0测定前房深度。结果UBM、A超、Orbscan、IOL Master 700、IOL Master 5.0的平均前房深度分别为(3.08±0.29)mm、(3.11±0.35)mm、(2.98±0.28)mm、(3.07±0.28)mm、(3.46±0.36)mm。五组间差异均有统计学意义(F=16.422, P=0.000)。除IOL Master 5.0外,4种方法间差异均无统计学意义(P=0.160)。五组间存在线性相关(Pall=0.000),一致性较好。结论UBM、A超、Orbscan、IOL Master 700、IOL Master 5.0对人工晶状体前房深度有较好的一致性和相关性。IOL Master 5.0测定的前房深度高于其他方法。关键词:深度;前腔;于是;超声扫描;Orbscan;IOL大师700;IOL大师5.0
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8728
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信