Cheap yet reliable cerebrospinal fluid DNA extraction for diagnosis of meningitis by polymerase chain reaction

Nur Adilla Zakaria, Suharni Mohamad, S. Suraiya
{"title":"Cheap yet reliable cerebrospinal fluid DNA extraction for diagnosis of meningitis by polymerase chain reaction","authors":"Nur Adilla Zakaria, Suharni Mohamad, S. Suraiya","doi":"10.5835/JECM.OMU.33.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been widely used for the detection of bacterial pathogens from various clinical samples. PCR is rewarded as a most sensitive diagnostic method; however, there are a lot of factors that may influence the success of the test, including good sample preparation. A good PCR result always depends on good quality and quantity of DNA extracted from the clinical sample. Currently there are a lot of commercially available DNA extraction kits; however the cost is high, especially so for routine diagnostic used in low resource countries. The purpose of the present study was to compare four DNA extraction protocols to determine the best limit of detection of the organism, total time taken for the DNA extraction and the cost. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were spiked with the Streptococcus pneumoniae. Then the extraction of DNA was done by boiling method, lysis and centrifugation, chelex method, and using commercially available DNA extraction kit. The targeted DNA was successfully amplified from all the methods applied, at different limit of detection. We conclude that, of these four methods, lysis method is as good as the commercially available DNA extraction kit in term of limit of detection, at a very low cost.","PeriodicalId":15770,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Medicine","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental & Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5835/JECM.OMU.33.02.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been widely used for the detection of bacterial pathogens from various clinical samples. PCR is rewarded as a most sensitive diagnostic method; however, there are a lot of factors that may influence the success of the test, including good sample preparation. A good PCR result always depends on good quality and quantity of DNA extracted from the clinical sample. Currently there are a lot of commercially available DNA extraction kits; however the cost is high, especially so for routine diagnostic used in low resource countries. The purpose of the present study was to compare four DNA extraction protocols to determine the best limit of detection of the organism, total time taken for the DNA extraction and the cost. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were spiked with the Streptococcus pneumoniae. Then the extraction of DNA was done by boiling method, lysis and centrifugation, chelex method, and using commercially available DNA extraction kit. The targeted DNA was successfully amplified from all the methods applied, at different limit of detection. We conclude that, of these four methods, lysis method is as good as the commercially available DNA extraction kit in term of limit of detection, at a very low cost.
廉价而可靠的脑脊液DNA提取聚合酶链反应诊断脑膜炎
聚合酶链反应(PCR)已广泛应用于各种临床样品的细菌病原体检测。PCR被认为是最灵敏的诊断方法;然而,有很多因素可能会影响测试的成功,包括良好的样品制备。良好的PCR结果往往取决于从临床样品中提取的DNA的质量和数量。目前市面上有很多DNA提取试剂盒;然而,成本很高,特别是在资源匮乏的国家使用的常规诊断。本研究的目的是比较四种DNA提取方案,以确定生物体的最佳检测限,DNA提取所需的总时间和成本。脑脊液(CSF)样品加标肺炎链球菌。然后采用煮沸法、裂解离心法、溶出法和市售DNA提取试剂盒提取DNA。在不同的检测限下,所有方法都成功地扩增了目标DNA。我们得出结论,在这四种方法中,酵解法在检测限方面与市售的DNA提取试剂盒一样好,而且成本很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信