Accountable Sports Journalism: Creating a Gateway to Showcase Ethical Codes, Stylebooks, Ombudsmen and Beyond

José Luis Rojas Torrijos, Xavier Ramon-Vegas
{"title":"Accountable Sports Journalism: Creating a Gateway to Showcase Ethical Codes, Stylebooks, Ombudsmen and Beyond","authors":"José Luis Rojas Torrijos, Xavier Ramon-Vegas","doi":"10.30958/ajspo.5-4-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sports journalism has been characterized by a series of ethical deficiencies that have challenged the normative standards of the profession. These widespread questionable practices include the blurring of the frontiers between journalistic genres; the pervasiveness of rumour; sensationalism; the use of warlike language; the inequalities in relation to gender, race and disability and the lack of variation in the news sources employed. All these ethical shortcomings have diminished the credibility of the professionals working in the sports journalism field. To address these ethical shortcomings, sports journalists must gain awareness of their accountability to answer for their practice to society at large. Accountability instruments can play an invaluable role in offering guidance and helping journalists and users monitor and criticize the quality of sports content. Thus far, the majority of studies on accountability have focused on the description of traditional and innovative tools but no study to date has provided a map of the existing instruments in sports journalism. To fill this gap, the objective of this investigation has been to identify and analyse the most relevant accountability instruments in sports journalism. The fieldwork consisted of monitoring the internet during a timeframe of 18 months (October 2015 – March 2017) to locate the most relevant instruments in the field. Once these were identified, the researchers proceeded to examine them using the qualitative content analysis technique. Among the instruments that have been implemented within companies, we highlight the ones produced inside the media (inhouse stylebooks promoted by major sports media, recommendations for sports journalists in news agencies and general information outlets, ombudsmen and online chats), and instruments produced outside media companies (external codes, recommendations issued by key stakeholders in the world of sport, the largest publications related to media criticism, as well as several scholars’ and citizens’ blogs).All these instruments are compiled on the platform “Accountable Sports Journalism”. 1","PeriodicalId":8622,"journal":{"name":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF SPORTS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF SPORTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajspo.5-4-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sports journalism has been characterized by a series of ethical deficiencies that have challenged the normative standards of the profession. These widespread questionable practices include the blurring of the frontiers between journalistic genres; the pervasiveness of rumour; sensationalism; the use of warlike language; the inequalities in relation to gender, race and disability and the lack of variation in the news sources employed. All these ethical shortcomings have diminished the credibility of the professionals working in the sports journalism field. To address these ethical shortcomings, sports journalists must gain awareness of their accountability to answer for their practice to society at large. Accountability instruments can play an invaluable role in offering guidance and helping journalists and users monitor and criticize the quality of sports content. Thus far, the majority of studies on accountability have focused on the description of traditional and innovative tools but no study to date has provided a map of the existing instruments in sports journalism. To fill this gap, the objective of this investigation has been to identify and analyse the most relevant accountability instruments in sports journalism. The fieldwork consisted of monitoring the internet during a timeframe of 18 months (October 2015 – March 2017) to locate the most relevant instruments in the field. Once these were identified, the researchers proceeded to examine them using the qualitative content analysis technique. Among the instruments that have been implemented within companies, we highlight the ones produced inside the media (inhouse stylebooks promoted by major sports media, recommendations for sports journalists in news agencies and general information outlets, ombudsmen and online chats), and instruments produced outside media companies (external codes, recommendations issued by key stakeholders in the world of sport, the largest publications related to media criticism, as well as several scholars’ and citizens’ blogs).All these instruments are compiled on the platform “Accountable Sports Journalism”. 1
负责任的体育新闻:创建一个展示道德规范、风格手册、监察员等的门户
体育新闻的特点是一系列道德缺陷,这些缺陷挑战了该职业的规范标准。这些广泛存在的有问题的做法包括新闻类型之间边界的模糊;谣言的蔓延;哗众取宠;使用好战的语言;与性别、种族和残疾有关的不平等以及所使用的新闻来源缺乏变化。所有这些道德缺陷都削弱了在体育新闻领域工作的专业人士的可信度。为了解决这些道德缺陷,体育记者必须意识到他们的责任,对整个社会负责。问责工具在提供指导和帮助记者和用户监督和批评体育内容质量方面可以发挥宝贵的作用。迄今为止,大多数关于问责制的研究都集中在对传统和创新工具的描述上,但迄今为止还没有研究提供体育新闻中现有工具的地图。为了填补这一空白,本调查的目的是确定和分析体育新闻中最相关的问责工具。现场工作包括在18个月的时间框架内(2015年10月至2017年3月)监测互联网,以定位现场最相关的仪器。一旦确定了这些,研究人员就开始使用定性内容分析技术对它们进行检查。在公司内部实施的工具中,我们重点介绍了媒体内部制作的工具(主要体育媒体推广的内部风格手册,为新闻机构和一般信息渠道的体育记者提供的建议,监察员和在线聊天),以及媒体公司外部制作的工具(外部代码,体育界主要利益相关者发布的建议,与媒体批评相关的最大出版物,以及一些学者和公民的博客)。所有这些文书都在“负责任的体育新闻”平台上编制。1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信