Investigating the level of Safety Considerations in Radiology Centers (North of Iran): Cross –Sectional Study

Q1 Medicine
Vajiheh Keshavarz, S. A. Rahimi
{"title":"Investigating the level of Safety Considerations in Radiology Centers (North of Iran): Cross –Sectional Study","authors":"Vajiheh Keshavarz, S. A. Rahimi","doi":"10.14302/ISSN.2690-0904.IJOE-21-3727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose\nProviding health care is the basic right of people(1).\n\nDiagnostic radiology is one of the main procedures in health care services and proper benefiting from this technology is brought only under well planning and management(1).\n\nSupervision of the available condition and its comparison with the recommended standards is a key role in assessing assurance from the benefit of these instruments (2). Data show that more than 80% of patients referring to these hospitals need radiology image (3).Improper service causes repetition of radiography and even wrong diagnosis, as a results threatening health of the patients (3) lack of protective barrier leads to the exposure of the staff to X-ray which is obviously carcinogen us (4). It happens that the instruments are not working properly, like of symmetry in X-ray field, defects in collimators, lack of adjusting ray field and X-ray, low quality or defective developing machine, lack of proper protective barrier, using low quality film and drugs, lack of protective barrier for children, all of which cause severe hazards for the patients and staff (4).\n\nMaterials and Methods\nThe crucial aim of medical services is to provide the public with their needs which are very important. The sensitivity of such services is to such an extent that in case of lack of care, the hazards are too high. In evaluation of health services, the first thing is to evaluate the device used. Methods, efficiency, profits and their combination for prevention and eradication of diseases are also important. Therefore to gain this goal, it is necessary the obtain results comparable with recommended standards. The purpose of this study was to access the conditions of radiology units at Mazandaran University hospitals and compare them with the standards of ICRU NCRP and ICRP. Radiology unit is the most expensive section of any hospital for its instruments, manpower and space provided. In a study conducted in 51centers on radiology staff, radiography room and protective barrier, ray leakage, the outcome were 89%, 82%, 77% and 37% respectively. It was found that the condition of these centers regarding the protective barriers is very unsuitable due to unawareness of the leakage (5, 6).Considering the mentioned necessities, in this study, the condition of radiography centers affiliated to the Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences was studied for the type and the rate of problem, in order to provide a proper solving method.\n\nResults\nData were collected through, observation, interviewing and filling questionnaire. Results show that, the situations of the radiology units are for from international standard, to such an extent that it is matched clout 50%.\n\nConclusion\nThe results showed that, none of the dark rooms are standard, and do not have proper alarm signal. In 63% of these units there no tiling system about staff protection from radiation.\n\nDefects in radiography room, protective barrier and lack looking rays were 60%, 51% and 47% respectively. Referring to the obtained data, periodic supervision, and obeying of the standards are necessary.","PeriodicalId":46545,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":"10-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14302/ISSN.2690-0904.IJOE-21-3727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose Providing health care is the basic right of people(1). Diagnostic radiology is one of the main procedures in health care services and proper benefiting from this technology is brought only under well planning and management(1). Supervision of the available condition and its comparison with the recommended standards is a key role in assessing assurance from the benefit of these instruments (2). Data show that more than 80% of patients referring to these hospitals need radiology image (3).Improper service causes repetition of radiography and even wrong diagnosis, as a results threatening health of the patients (3) lack of protective barrier leads to the exposure of the staff to X-ray which is obviously carcinogen us (4). It happens that the instruments are not working properly, like of symmetry in X-ray field, defects in collimators, lack of adjusting ray field and X-ray, low quality or defective developing machine, lack of proper protective barrier, using low quality film and drugs, lack of protective barrier for children, all of which cause severe hazards for the patients and staff (4). Materials and Methods The crucial aim of medical services is to provide the public with their needs which are very important. The sensitivity of such services is to such an extent that in case of lack of care, the hazards are too high. In evaluation of health services, the first thing is to evaluate the device used. Methods, efficiency, profits and their combination for prevention and eradication of diseases are also important. Therefore to gain this goal, it is necessary the obtain results comparable with recommended standards. The purpose of this study was to access the conditions of radiology units at Mazandaran University hospitals and compare them with the standards of ICRU NCRP and ICRP. Radiology unit is the most expensive section of any hospital for its instruments, manpower and space provided. In a study conducted in 51centers on radiology staff, radiography room and protective barrier, ray leakage, the outcome were 89%, 82%, 77% and 37% respectively. It was found that the condition of these centers regarding the protective barriers is very unsuitable due to unawareness of the leakage (5, 6).Considering the mentioned necessities, in this study, the condition of radiography centers affiliated to the Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences was studied for the type and the rate of problem, in order to provide a proper solving method. Results Data were collected through, observation, interviewing and filling questionnaire. Results show that, the situations of the radiology units are for from international standard, to such an extent that it is matched clout 50%. Conclusion The results showed that, none of the dark rooms are standard, and do not have proper alarm signal. In 63% of these units there no tiling system about staff protection from radiation. Defects in radiography room, protective barrier and lack looking rays were 60%, 51% and 47% respectively. Referring to the obtained data, periodic supervision, and obeying of the standards are necessary.
调查放射中心(伊朗北部)的安全考虑水平:横断面研究
背景与目的提供卫生保健是人的基本权利(1)。诊断放射学是医疗保健服务的主要程序之一,只有在良好的规划和管理下才能从这项技术中获得适当的好处(1)。对可用条件的监督及其与推荐标准的比较是评估这些仪器效益保证的关键作用(2)。数据显示,超过80%的患者转诊到这些医院需要放射影像(3)。服务不当导致重复放射成像,甚至错误诊断。(3)防护屏障的缺乏导致医护人员暴露在具有明显致癌物的x射线下;(4)仪器工作不正常,如x射线场不对称、准直器缺陷、射线场和x射线调节不足、显影机质量低劣或有缺陷、防护屏障缺失、使用劣质胶片和药品、儿童防护屏障缺失;(4)材料与方法医疗服务的关键目的是满足公众的需求,这是非常重要的。这些服务的敏感性是如此之高,以至于如果不小心,危害就太高了。在评估卫生服务时,首先要评估所使用的设备。预防和根除疾病的方法、效率、利润及其结合也很重要。因此,为了实现这一目标,有必要获得与推荐标准相当的结果。本研究的目的是了解Mazandaran大学医院放射科的情况,并将其与ICRU NCRP和ICRP的标准进行比较。放射科是所有医院中仪器、人力和空间最昂贵的科室。在51个中心对放射科工作人员、放射线室和防护屏障、漏射线的调查中,成功率分别为89%、82%、77%和37%。我们发现这些中心在防护屏障方面的条件非常不合适,因为没有意识到泄漏(5,6)。考虑到上述必要性,本研究对马桑达兰医学大学附属放射中心的情况进行了问题类型和发生率的研究,以提供适当的解决方法。结果采用观察法、访谈法和问卷法收集数据。结果表明,放射科单位的情况与国际标准相差甚远,达到了50%的匹配度。结论所有暗房均不符合标准,暗房报警信号不健全。在这些单位中,有63%没有保护工作人员免受辐射的贴片系统。射线室缺陷占60%,防护屏障缺陷占51%,射线缺乏缺陷占47%。参考所获得的数据,定期监督,并遵守标准是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信