Process, tools and agendas in LADO

IF 0.5 4区社会学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY

International Journal of Speech Language and the Law Pub Date : 2022-05-24 DOI:10.1558/ijsll.20224

Y. Matras

引用次数: 0

Abstract

After recapitulating my arguments about methodological flaws in the practices of the company Verified AB in language analysis for the determination of origin (LADO) in asylum procedures, I respond to criticisms of my proposals for an alternative protocol and review the relevance of qualifications, control samples, language variation and scales. I then discuss the interplay of professional competence, ideological bias and understandings of the task and demonstrate the pitfalls of the pre-set framing of the question of the applicants’ background.

查看原文本刊更多论文

LADO的流程、工具和议程

在概述了我关于在庇护程序中确定原产地(LADO)的语言分析中验证AB公司实践中的方法缺陷的论点之后，我回应了对我的替代协议建议的批评，并审查了资格，控制样本，语言变化和尺度的相关性。然后，我讨论了专业能力、意识形态偏见和对任务的理解之间的相互作用，并展示了预先设定的申请人背景问题框架的陷阱。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Speech Language and the Law Multiple-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles on any aspect of forensic language, speech and audio analysis. Founded in 1994 as Forensic Linguistics, the journal changed to its present title in 2003 to reflect a broadening of academic coverage and readership. Subscription to the journal is included in membership of the International Association of Forensic Linguists and the International Association for Forensic Phonetics and Acoustics.