Ethics and responsibility

Q3 Social Sciences

Environmental Practice Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI:10.1080/14660466.2019.1654357

Betty Dehoney

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Editing scientific reports to misrepresent data; stopping research intended to support policy decisions; and making important policy and legal decisions by individuals with financial and personal relationships and conflicts-of-interest without relying upon scientific input, seem to happen more frequently these days. As environmental professionals, individuals question our integrity because they do not like the conclusions reached in the analyses. The integrity (i.e., ethics) of professionals may be questioned when the studies are financed by those with an interest in the outcome.

查看原文本刊更多论文

道德与责任

编辑科学报告歪曲数据;停止旨在支持政策决定的研究;在没有依靠科学投入的情况下，由拥有经济和个人关系以及利益冲突的个人制定重要的政策和法律决定，似乎越来越频繁。作为环境专家，个人质疑我们的诚信，因为他们不喜欢在分析中得出的结论。当研究是由那些对研究结果感兴趣的人资助时，专业人员的诚信(即道德)可能会受到质疑。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Environmental Practice ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Environmental Practice provides a multidisciplinary forum for authoritative discussion and analysis of issues of wide interest to the international community of environmental professionals, with the intent of developing innovative solutions to environmental problems for public policy implementation, professional practice, or both. Peer-reviewed original research papers, environmental reviews, and commentaries, along with news articles, book reviews, and points of view, link findings in science and technology with issues of public policy, health, environmental quality, law, political economy, management, and the appropriate standards for expertise. Published for the National Association of Environmental Professionals