Analysis of the Interrater Reliability and Agreement of Breaking Battles in the 2018 Buenos Aires Youth Olympics

Jin Su Suk, Kyungja Jun
{"title":"Analysis of the Interrater Reliability and Agreement of Breaking Battles in the 2018 Buenos Aires Youth Olympics","authors":"Jin Su Suk, Kyungja Jun","doi":"10.24985/kjss.2023.34.2.210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE This study aimed to establish a standardized evaluation of the consistency and reliability of the results of the 2018 Buenos Aires Youth Olympics.METHODS The results of the preliminary and the final rounds of the individual Boys and Girls competition of the 2018 Buenos Aires Youth Olympics were collected. Data were organized using Microsoft Windows Excel 2021. Windows SPSS 26.0 was used for descriptive statistics. Intraclass correlation coefficient calculation was used to analyze the evaluation score. The winner/loser decision, and the evaluation interrater agreement was confirmed using Fleiss' kappa.RESULTS There was a difference in the scores given by the judges in both the preliminary and final rounds of both competitions. A low correlation was observed between the decided winner of the judges, and the point variance for each item.CONCLUSIONS In the trivium value system, differences in the evaluation strategies of the judges may exist. Thus, improvements to standardize evaluation should be implemented. In addition, this scoring system considers various factors in the evaluation process, and the scoring system is complicated. Therefore, there may be a need to revise the evaluation system and find the optimal number of judges to create a better evaluation.","PeriodicalId":17892,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Sport Science","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Sport Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24985/kjss.2023.34.2.210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE This study aimed to establish a standardized evaluation of the consistency and reliability of the results of the 2018 Buenos Aires Youth Olympics.METHODS The results of the preliminary and the final rounds of the individual Boys and Girls competition of the 2018 Buenos Aires Youth Olympics were collected. Data were organized using Microsoft Windows Excel 2021. Windows SPSS 26.0 was used for descriptive statistics. Intraclass correlation coefficient calculation was used to analyze the evaluation score. The winner/loser decision, and the evaluation interrater agreement was confirmed using Fleiss' kappa.RESULTS There was a difference in the scores given by the judges in both the preliminary and final rounds of both competitions. A low correlation was observed between the decided winner of the judges, and the point variance for each item.CONCLUSIONS In the trivium value system, differences in the evaluation strategies of the judges may exist. Thus, improvements to standardize evaluation should be implemented. In addition, this scoring system considers various factors in the evaluation process, and the scoring system is complicated. Therefore, there may be a need to revise the evaluation system and find the optimal number of judges to create a better evaluation.
2018年布宜诺斯艾利斯青年奥运会决赛圈的互判员可靠性与一致性分析
本研究旨在建立对2018年布宜诺斯艾利斯青年奥运会结果一致性和可靠性的标准化评估。方法收集2018年布宜诺斯艾利斯青年奥运会男女单项比赛初赛和决赛结果。数据使用Microsoft Windows Excel 2021进行整理。采用Windows SPSS 26.0进行描述性统计。采用类内相关系数计算对评价评分进行分析。使用Fleiss的kappa来确定赢家/输家的决定,以及评估人员的协议。结果两场比赛初赛和决赛的裁判评分存在差异。裁判判定的获胜者和每个项目的得分差异之间的相关性很低。结论在三要素价值体系中,法官的评价策略可能存在差异。因此,应实施改进措施,使评价标准化。此外,该评分体系考虑了评价过程中的各种因素,评分体系较为复杂。因此,可能需要修改评估制度,寻找最佳的法官人数,以创造更好的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信