Simple and accessible screening method for congenital thrombopathies using an impedance haematology counter – reply: The differences between impedance aggregometry in whole blood versus aggregometry in PRP. Is there a need for caution?

Ingrid Skornova, Jan Stasko, Amalia Ocenasova, Peter Kubisz
{"title":"Simple and accessible screening method for congenital thrombopathies using an impedance haematology counter – reply: The differences between impedance aggregometry in whole blood versus aggregometry in PRP. Is there a need for caution?","authors":"Ingrid Skornova,&nbsp;Jan Stasko,&nbsp;Amalia Ocenasova,&nbsp;Peter Kubisz","doi":"10.1016/j.jmhi.2013.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Brahimi et al. in this journal formed a hypothesis that “the platelet count is underestimated, by an automated cell counter, each time platelet aggregates are present in the sample tube.” The addition of a platelet agonist to a stimulated sample tube will lead to the formation of platelet aggregates and hence to a drop in the platelet count. In the case of a hereditary platelet dysfunction, platelet aggregates cannot be formed upon addition of a platelet agonist and the platelet count will remain unchanged. The authors propose a hypothesis to develop “a more accessible screening technique for these hereditary platelet dysfunctions.” In our reply, we critically evaluate this screening method and focus on the importance of the differences between impedance aggregometry in whole blood versus aggregometry in platelet-rich plasma.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ideas","volume":"8 1","pages":"Pages 21-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jmhi.2013.07.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2251729413000189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Brahimi et al. in this journal formed a hypothesis that “the platelet count is underestimated, by an automated cell counter, each time platelet aggregates are present in the sample tube.” The addition of a platelet agonist to a stimulated sample tube will lead to the formation of platelet aggregates and hence to a drop in the platelet count. In the case of a hereditary platelet dysfunction, platelet aggregates cannot be formed upon addition of a platelet agonist and the platelet count will remain unchanged. The authors propose a hypothesis to develop “a more accessible screening technique for these hereditary platelet dysfunctions.” In our reply, we critically evaluate this screening method and focus on the importance of the differences between impedance aggregometry in whole blood versus aggregometry in platelet-rich plasma.

Abstract Image

使用阻抗血液学反应答的先天性血栓病简单易行的筛查方法:全血阻抗聚集与PRP聚集的差异。有必要保持谨慎吗?
Brahimi等人在该杂志中提出了一个假设,即“每次在样管中出现血小板聚集时,自动细胞计数器都会低估血小板计数。”在受刺激的样管中加入血小板激动剂会导致血小板聚集的形成,从而导致血小板计数的下降。在遗传性血小板功能障碍的情况下,血小板聚集不能在添加血小板激动剂后形成,血小板计数将保持不变。作者提出了一种假设,以发展“一种更容易获得的筛查这些遗传性血小板功能障碍的技术”。在我们的回复中,我们批判性地评估了这种筛选方法,并重点讨论了全血阻抗聚集性与富血小板血浆阻抗聚集性之间差异的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信