Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of different methods of surgical hemostasis in patients with placenta accreta spectrum disorders

V. Tskhay, A. A. Bakunina
{"title":"Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of different methods of surgical hemostasis in patients with placenta accreta spectrum disorders","authors":"V. Tskhay, A. A. Bakunina","doi":"10.21886/2219-8075-2022-13-3-161-172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, the medical community has accumulated significant experience in the use of endovascular methods in obstetric practice to achieve hemostasis and prevent massive hemorrhage, including in patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders. Objective — to evaluate the effectiveness of various methods of uterine devascularization in reducing blood loss during caesarean section in patients with PAS. In this review, we analyzed relevant literature and assessed the quality of clinical trials based on a systematic search in the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. The review presents an overview of modern methods of uterine devascularization aimed at reducing intraoperative blood loss in patients with PAS. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of such methods of uterine devascularization as temporary balloon occlusion of the internal iliac arteries, common iliac arteries, abdominal aorta, as well as arterial compression using distal hemostasis was carried out. We evaluated effectiveness of the methods by such indicators as the mean amount of blood loss and the frequency of hysterectomy. The most effective methods of hemostasis in patients with PAS are temporary balloon occlusion of the abdominal aorta and the method of distal hemostasis. At the same time, there is still no ideal method for uterine devascularization in PAS, and clinical research in this direction should be continued.","PeriodicalId":18314,"journal":{"name":"Medical Herald of the South of Russia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Herald of the South of Russia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21886/2219-8075-2022-13-3-161-172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Currently, the medical community has accumulated significant experience in the use of endovascular methods in obstetric practice to achieve hemostasis and prevent massive hemorrhage, including in patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders. Objective — to evaluate the effectiveness of various methods of uterine devascularization in reducing blood loss during caesarean section in patients with PAS. In this review, we analyzed relevant literature and assessed the quality of clinical trials based on a systematic search in the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. The review presents an overview of modern methods of uterine devascularization aimed at reducing intraoperative blood loss in patients with PAS. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of such methods of uterine devascularization as temporary balloon occlusion of the internal iliac arteries, common iliac arteries, abdominal aorta, as well as arterial compression using distal hemostasis was carried out. We evaluated effectiveness of the methods by such indicators as the mean amount of blood loss and the frequency of hysterectomy. The most effective methods of hemostasis in patients with PAS are temporary balloon occlusion of the abdominal aorta and the method of distal hemostasis. At the same time, there is still no ideal method for uterine devascularization in PAS, and clinical research in this direction should be continued.
不同手术止血方法治疗增生性胎盘谱系障碍的疗效比较分析
目前,医学界在产科实践中使用血管内方法实现止血和预防大出血方面积累了丰富的经验,包括在患有胎盘增生谱(PAS)疾病的患者中。目的:评价各种子宫断流术对减少PAS患者剖宫产术中出血量的效果。在这篇综述中,我们分析了相关文献,并基于Embase、PubMed、Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库的系统检索评估了临床试验的质量。本文综述了旨在减少PAS患者术中出血量的现代子宫断流术方法。对比分析暂时性球囊闭塞髂内动脉、髂总动脉、腹主动脉及远端止血压迫动脉等宫内断流术的效果。我们通过平均失血量和子宫切除次数等指标来评价方法的有效性。PAS患者最有效的止血方法是暂时性球囊阻断腹主动脉和远端止血法。同时,PAS中仍没有理想的子宫断流方法,应继续在此方向进行临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信