Model verification of analogue infiltration predictions

R.E. Bilsborrow , F.R. Fricke
{"title":"Model verification of analogue infiltration predictions","authors":"R.E. Bilsborrow ,&nbsp;F.R. Fricke","doi":"10.1016/0007-3628(75)90034-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A survey of current methods of calculating natural ventilation and infiltration rates showed that most design recommendations are based on the results of digital analogue studies. As the natural ventilation rate calculation methods reviewed make a number of simplifying assumptions, which have not been experimentally verified, studies have been carried out, using scale model buildings in a wind tunnel, to investigate the validity of these methods. Calculated ventilation rates were found to be up to 30% higher than the model ventilation rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9442,"journal":{"name":"Building Science","volume":"10 4","pages":"Pages 217-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0007-3628(75)90034-1","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Science","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0007362875900341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

A survey of current methods of calculating natural ventilation and infiltration rates showed that most design recommendations are based on the results of digital analogue studies. As the natural ventilation rate calculation methods reviewed make a number of simplifying assumptions, which have not been experimentally verified, studies have been carried out, using scale model buildings in a wind tunnel, to investigate the validity of these methods. Calculated ventilation rates were found to be up to 30% higher than the model ventilation rates.

模拟入渗预测的模型验证
一项对目前计算自然通风和渗透率的方法的调查表明,大多数设计建议都是基于数字模拟研究的结果。由于所审查的自然通风量计算方法进行了许多简化的假设,这些假设尚未得到实验验证,因此在风洞中使用比例模型建筑物进行研究,以调查这些方法的有效性。计算出的通风率比模型通风率高出30%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信