Rhetoric of Zarathustra: Metaphors as an Element of Nietzsche’s Philosophy

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Alexander A. Sysolyatin
{"title":"Rhetoric of Zarathustra: Metaphors as an Element of Nietzsche’s Philosophy","authors":"Alexander A. Sysolyatin","doi":"10.21146/2074-5869-2022-27-1-35-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article the author analyzes Zarathustra as a literary element of text from Nietzsche’s point of view on rhetoric and nature of language. On the basis of early Nietzsche’s writings the distinction between two rhetoric regimes, stabilization of metaphors and overproduction of metaphors, has been established. In addition to this, the author reveals a conceptual correspondence between rhetoric regimes and apollonian – dionysian pair. Further it is demonstrated that in “Thus spoke Zarathustra” its main character continuously oscillates from one regime to another, and this oscillation is marked with terminological distinction between dream (Traum) and euphoria (Rausch). The author attempts to reconstruct the distinction between tragic hero, which rhetoric purpose consists in control of dionysian metaphors, and overhero-Zarathustra, with use of which Nietzsche tries to exceed an opposition between rhetoric regimes.","PeriodicalId":53558,"journal":{"name":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-5869-2022-27-1-35-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article the author analyzes Zarathustra as a literary element of text from Nietzsche’s point of view on rhetoric and nature of language. On the basis of early Nietzsche’s writings the distinction between two rhetoric regimes, stabilization of metaphors and overproduction of metaphors, has been established. In addition to this, the author reveals a conceptual correspondence between rhetoric regimes and apollonian – dionysian pair. Further it is demonstrated that in “Thus spoke Zarathustra” its main character continuously oscillates from one regime to another, and this oscillation is marked with terminological distinction between dream (Traum) and euphoria (Rausch). The author attempts to reconstruct the distinction between tragic hero, which rhetoric purpose consists in control of dionysian metaphors, and overhero-Zarathustra, with use of which Nietzsche tries to exceed an opposition between rhetoric regimes.
查拉图斯特拉的修辞学:隐喻是尼采哲学的一个元素
本文从尼采关于修辞学和语言本质的观点出发,分析查拉图斯特拉作为文本的文学元素。在尼采早期著作的基础上,确立了两种修辞体制的区别,即隐喻的稳定和隐喻的过度生产。除此之外,作者还揭示了修辞体制与阿波罗-酒神配对之间的概念对应关系。进一步证明,在“查拉图斯特拉如是说”中,它的主角不断地从一个政权到另一个政权振荡,这种振荡以梦(Traum)和欣快(Rausch)之间的术语区分为标志。作者试图重构悲剧英雄与查拉图斯特拉的区别,悲剧英雄的修辞目的在于对酒神隐喻的控制,而查拉图斯特拉则试图利用悲剧英雄超越修辞体制之间的对立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
History of Philosophy Quarterly
History of Philosophy Quarterly Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信