The Optical Translucency, Opalescence, and Reflectance of Different As-Received Ceramic Brackets: A Spectrophotometer Study

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Anisa H. AlBadr, Nabeel F. Talic
{"title":"The Optical Translucency, Opalescence, and Reflectance of Different As-Received Ceramic Brackets: A Spectrophotometer Study","authors":"Anisa H. AlBadr, Nabeel F. Talic","doi":"10.1177/23202068231195181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To determine the difference in the reflected color coordinates and to compare the translucency and opacity of different as-received ceramic brackets using a spectrophotometer. Four types of ceramic brackets were investigated in this in vitro study. A total of 72 ceramic brackets were examined using a spectrophotometer. Reflected color coordinates of the labial side of bracket were measured according to the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE) color scale. Color difference between brackets was calculated using the equation: Δ E*ab = [(Δ L*)2 + (Δ a*)2 + (Δ b*)2] 1/2. Translucency parameter (TP) and opalescence parameter (OP) were calculated to determine translucency and opacity of the brackets, respectively. Data was collected and analyzed using IBM SPSS V25. The significance level was set at p ≤ .05. One-way ANOVA and post hoc multiple comparison tests were utilized. The range for CIE L* (lightness) was 62.69 to 58.83, for a* (red–green parameter) −0.33 to −2.9 and for b* (yellow–blue parameter) −2.19 to 2.29. All these color co-ordinates were influenced by bracket brand ( p < .05). DISCREET™ showed the highest TP = 16.342 and Symetri™ Clear showed the lowest = 10.823. The OP values ranged between 1.783 and 3.781 and Symetri™ Clear showed the highest OP. Color coordinates, TP, and OP of esthetic brackets investigated with a spectrophotometer were significantly different and influenced by the material microstructure and/or manufacturing process.","PeriodicalId":43017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23202068231195181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine the difference in the reflected color coordinates and to compare the translucency and opacity of different as-received ceramic brackets using a spectrophotometer. Four types of ceramic brackets were investigated in this in vitro study. A total of 72 ceramic brackets were examined using a spectrophotometer. Reflected color coordinates of the labial side of bracket were measured according to the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE) color scale. Color difference between brackets was calculated using the equation: Δ E*ab = [(Δ L*)2 + (Δ a*)2 + (Δ b*)2] 1/2. Translucency parameter (TP) and opalescence parameter (OP) were calculated to determine translucency and opacity of the brackets, respectively. Data was collected and analyzed using IBM SPSS V25. The significance level was set at p ≤ .05. One-way ANOVA and post hoc multiple comparison tests were utilized. The range for CIE L* (lightness) was 62.69 to 58.83, for a* (red–green parameter) −0.33 to −2.9 and for b* (yellow–blue parameter) −2.19 to 2.29. All these color co-ordinates were influenced by bracket brand ( p < .05). DISCREET™ showed the highest TP = 16.342 and Symetri™ Clear showed the lowest = 10.823. The OP values ranged between 1.783 and 3.781 and Symetri™ Clear showed the highest OP. Color coordinates, TP, and OP of esthetic brackets investigated with a spectrophotometer were significantly different and influenced by the material microstructure and/or manufacturing process.
不同接收陶瓷支架的光学半透明性、乳光性和反射率:分光光度计研究
用分光光度计测定反射色坐标的差异,并比较不同接收陶瓷支架的半透明性和不透明度。四种类型的陶瓷托槽进行了体外研究。用分光光度计对72个陶瓷托架进行了检测。根据CIE (Commission Internationale de l’eclairage)色标测量支架唇侧反射色坐标。括号间色差计算公式为:Δ E*ab = [(Δ L*)2 + (Δ a*)2 + (Δ b*)2] 1/2。计算半透明参数(TP)和乳光参数(OP),分别确定括号的半透明和不透明。数据收集和分析采用IBM SPSS V25软件。显著性水平设为p≤0.05。采用单因素方差分析和事后多重比较检验。CIE L*(亮度)的范围为62.69 ~ 58.83,a*(红绿参数)的范围为- 0.33 ~ - 2.9,b*(黄蓝参数)的范围为- 2.19 ~ 2.29。这些颜色坐标均受支架品牌的影响(p < 0.05)。DISCREET™最高TP = 16.342, Symetri™Clear最低TP = 10.823。OP值范围在1.783和3.781之间,Symetri™Clear显示出最高的OP值。用分光光度计研究美学支架的颜色坐标、TP和OP显著不同,并受材料微观结构和/或制造工艺的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Oral Research
Journal of Advanced Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信