Evaluation of the Remineralizing Effect of Natural Versus Synthetic Materials on Deep Carious Dentin

Dalia M. Elasser, maha niazy, W. jamil, Doaa A. Elsharkawy, Haneya A. A. Anani
{"title":"Evaluation of the Remineralizing Effect of Natural Versus Synthetic Materials on Deep Carious Dentin","authors":"Dalia M. Elasser, maha niazy, W. jamil, Doaa A. Elsharkawy, Haneya A. A. Anani","doi":"10.21608/adjg.2022.100631.1417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose : The purpose of this in-vivo study was to investigate the remineralizing effects of natural (propolis, hesperidin) versus synthetic agent (silver diamine fluoride with potassium iodide) after treatment of deep carious dentin at different time intervals. Materials and methods: Patients with deep carious class I lesions were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Class I carious lesions were randomly distributed into 4 groups according to treatment material: 1. Propolis, 2. Hesperidin, 3.Silver diamine fluoride with potassium iodide (SDF+KI), and 4. Control group (no treatment). Class I cavities were all prepared using step-wise caries removal technique. The treatment materials were then applied on the remaining carious dentin and restored with a glass ionomer (GIC) restoration. Assessment of remineralization was done by measurement of mineral-density of dentin using digital x-ray machine at baseline, 6-weeks and 12-weeks time intervals. Results: Silver diamine fluoride had a higher significant remineralizing effect than control, propolis or hesperidin. While propolis had a higher significant remineralizing effect than hesperidin. Conclusions: Both silver diamine fluoride and propolis agents have remarkable effect on remineralization of carious dental tissues.","PeriodicalId":7493,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","volume":"9 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2022.100631.1417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose : The purpose of this in-vivo study was to investigate the remineralizing effects of natural (propolis, hesperidin) versus synthetic agent (silver diamine fluoride with potassium iodide) after treatment of deep carious dentin at different time intervals. Materials and methods: Patients with deep carious class I lesions were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Class I carious lesions were randomly distributed into 4 groups according to treatment material: 1. Propolis, 2. Hesperidin, 3.Silver diamine fluoride with potassium iodide (SDF+KI), and 4. Control group (no treatment). Class I cavities were all prepared using step-wise caries removal technique. The treatment materials were then applied on the remaining carious dentin and restored with a glass ionomer (GIC) restoration. Assessment of remineralization was done by measurement of mineral-density of dentin using digital x-ray machine at baseline, 6-weeks and 12-weeks time intervals. Results: Silver diamine fluoride had a higher significant remineralizing effect than control, propolis or hesperidin. While propolis had a higher significant remineralizing effect than hesperidin. Conclusions: Both silver diamine fluoride and propolis agents have remarkable effect on remineralization of carious dental tissues.
天然与合成材料对深龋牙本质再矿化效果的评价
目的:研究天然(蜂胶、橙皮苷)与人工合成(氟化二胺银加碘化钾)治疗牙本质深度龋病后不同时间间隔的再矿化效果。材料和方法:根据纳入和排除标准,选择深龋I级病变患者。ⅰ类龋齿病变根据治疗材料随机分为4组:1.龋齿;蜂胶,2。橘皮苷3。二胺氟化银与碘化钾(SDF+KI),和4。对照组(未治疗)。I级蛀牙均采用分步除龋技术制备。然后将治疗材料应用于剩余的龋齿本质上,并使用玻璃离子修复体(GIC)修复。在基线、6周和12周的时间间隔使用数字x线机测量牙本质矿物质密度来评估再矿化。结果:氟化二胺银的再矿化效果明显高于对照、蜂胶和橙皮苷。蜂胶的再矿化作用显著高于橙皮苷。结论:氟化二胺银和蜂胶制剂对龋牙组织再矿化均有显著效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信