A validation study of the Miville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale in South Africa

IF 1.2 4区 管理学 Q3 ECONOMICS
C. Viljoen, Crizelle Els
{"title":"A validation study of the Miville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale in South Africa","authors":"C. Viljoen, Crizelle Els","doi":"10.4102/sajems.v26i1.4856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In order for organisations to best implement diversity management programmes that will create an environment in which diversity is appreciated and utilised optimally to achieve organisational outcomes, they need to first identify the attitudes and orientations that individuals in the organisation have towards diversity. Universal-diverse orientation (UDO) is a largely under-researched topic in South Africa, and currently no instrument measuring UDO has been validated in a South African context.Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the Miville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale (M-GUDS) in South Africa.Setting: The study was conducted among the general working population in the Gauteng Province in South Africa.Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional research design was followed. A heterogeneous sample of 255 South African employees from the general working population in Gauteng was selected to complete a voluntary web-based questionnaire.Results: The results confirm that the M-GUDS is reliable; the factorial validity, and convergent and divergent validity of the M-GUDS are also confirmed. The predictive validity of the instrument is partly confirmed.Conclusion: This study contributes to the limited research that has been done on UDO in South Africa by providing a valid instrument that can give additional insight into organisations on the orientations and attitudes of employees toward diversity. This provides organisations with a platform to assess their diversity orientation that can be used to inform diversity management programmes.Contribution: This study contributes to the limited research that has been done on UDO in South Africa, as well as addresses the gap of a lacking instrument to measure UDO in South Africa by validating the M-GUDS.","PeriodicalId":46244,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences","volume":"166 7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v26i1.4856","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In order for organisations to best implement diversity management programmes that will create an environment in which diversity is appreciated and utilised optimally to achieve organisational outcomes, they need to first identify the attitudes and orientations that individuals in the organisation have towards diversity. Universal-diverse orientation (UDO) is a largely under-researched topic in South Africa, and currently no instrument measuring UDO has been validated in a South African context.Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the Miville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale (M-GUDS) in South Africa.Setting: The study was conducted among the general working population in the Gauteng Province in South Africa.Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional research design was followed. A heterogeneous sample of 255 South African employees from the general working population in Gauteng was selected to complete a voluntary web-based questionnaire.Results: The results confirm that the M-GUDS is reliable; the factorial validity, and convergent and divergent validity of the M-GUDS are also confirmed. The predictive validity of the instrument is partly confirmed.Conclusion: This study contributes to the limited research that has been done on UDO in South Africa by providing a valid instrument that can give additional insight into organisations on the orientations and attitudes of employees toward diversity. This provides organisations with a platform to assess their diversity orientation that can be used to inform diversity management programmes.Contribution: This study contributes to the limited research that has been done on UDO in South Africa, as well as addresses the gap of a lacking instrument to measure UDO in South Africa by validating the M-GUDS.
南非Miville-Guzman普遍性多样性量表的验证性研究
背景:为了让组织最好地实施多样性管理计划,创造一个环境,在这个环境中,多样性得到认可,并以最佳方式利用,以实现组织成果,他们需要首先确定组织中个人对多样性的态度和取向。普遍多样化取向(UDO)在南非是一个很大程度上研究不足的课题,目前没有测量UDO的工具在南非的背景下得到验证。目的:本研究的目的是确定南非Miville-Guzman普遍性多样性量表(M-GUDS)的心理测量特征。背景:这项研究是在南非豪登省的一般工作人口中进行的。方法:采用定量横断面研究设计。从豪登省的一般工作人口中选出255名南非雇员的异质样本来完成一份基于网络的自愿问卷。结果:M-GUDS检测结果可靠;并验证了M-GUDS的析因效度、收敛效度和发散效度。该仪器的预测有效性得到部分证实。结论:本研究有助于有限的研究,已经在南非做了UDO,提供了一个有效的工具,可以给更多的洞察组织的方向和员工对多样性的态度。这为组织提供了一个评估其多样性取向的平台,可用于通知多样性管理计划。贡献:本研究对南非关于UDO的有限研究做出了贡献,并通过验证M-GUDS解决了南非缺乏测量UDO的工具的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
29
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences (SAJEMS) is a leading South African-based publication for interdisciplinary research in the economic and management sciences. The journal publishes and disseminates high-quality academic articles that contribute to the better understanding of the interaction between economic, environmental and social perspectives as applicable to the broader management sciences in an African environment. The editorial board therefore invites authors to submit their research from areas such as economics, finance, accounting, human capital, marketing and other related disciplines that break down common intellectual silos and prepares a new path for debate on the operation and development of sustainable markets and organisations as relevant to the broader African context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信