Pengaturan Hukum Mengenai Kedudukan Keputusan yang Dimohonkan kepada Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara

Yogi Pratama, Muhammad Irsyad Tirtasah, Yarni Nikita Ahmady, Ardoyo Wardhana
{"title":"Pengaturan Hukum Mengenai Kedudukan Keputusan yang Dimohonkan kepada Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara","authors":"Yogi Pratama, Muhammad Irsyad Tirtasah, Yarni Nikita Ahmady, Ardoyo Wardhana","doi":"10.30649/ph.v19i1.165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to find out two matters. the first matter is to find out how the paradigm of Law Number 5 Year 1986 and Law Number 30 Year 2014 on decisions that are petitioned to State Administrative Officials (hereinafter TUN Officials). Second, to find out the legal implications of the differences in the position of decisions that are applied to TUN Officials based on Law Number 5 Year 1986 and Law Number 30 Year 2014. The following research results, (1) that related to the paradigm of Article 3 of the Law on State Administrative Court and Article 53 of the Government Administration Law, should be related to the type of decision.. (2) The legal implication of the decision’s differences that have been petitioned to TUN officials may allow confusion to occur when it is applied in the process of administering the government and also the process in court.","PeriodicalId":31466,"journal":{"name":"Perspektif Hukum Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspektif Hukum Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v19i1.165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to find out two matters. the first matter is to find out how the paradigm of Law Number 5 Year 1986 and Law Number 30 Year 2014 on decisions that are petitioned to State Administrative Officials (hereinafter TUN Officials). Second, to find out the legal implications of the differences in the position of decisions that are applied to TUN Officials based on Law Number 5 Year 1986 and Law Number 30 Year 2014. The following research results, (1) that related to the paradigm of Article 3 of the Law on State Administrative Court and Article 53 of the Government Administration Law, should be related to the type of decision.. (2) The legal implication of the decision’s differences that have been petitioned to TUN officials may allow confusion to occur when it is applied in the process of administering the government and also the process in court.
向国家行政官员上诉的法律职位安排
这项研究的目的是找出两个问题。首先要找出1986年第5号法和2014年第30号法中关于向国家行政官员(以下简称TUN官员)请愿的决定的范例。其次,根据1986年第5号法律和2014年第30号法律,找出适用于TUN官员的决定立场差异的法律含义。研究结果如下:(1)与《国家行政法院法》第3条和《政府行政法》第53条的范式相关的研究结果应与判决类型相关。(2)向TUN官员请愿的决定差异的法律含义,可能会导致在管理政府的过程中以及在法庭上应用该决定时出现混乱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信