Editor's Introduction

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Randall G. Colton
{"title":"Editor's Introduction","authors":"Randall G. Colton","doi":"10.5325/jnietstud.44.2.0139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This year marks the twentyfifth and twentieth anniversaries of two of Pope St. John Paul’s most important encyclicals. Promulgated in 1993, Veritatis Splendor sets out the principles of Catholic moral teaching and analyzes the dissent it has sometimes met; Fides et Ratio, written five years later, responds to certain errors with respect to the work of reason and its relation to faith, errors that underwrite a widespread lack of confidence in truth and a corruption of both philosophy itself and the attempts of plain persons to make sense of their own lives. John Paul himself draws the connection between these two encyclicals this way: “In . . . Veritatis Splendor . . . I draw attention to ‘certain fundamental truths of Catholic doctrine. . . .’ In the present letter, I wish to pursue that reflection by concentrating on the theme of truth itself and its foundation in relation to faith” (n. 6). These encyclicals, then, share a common emphasis on truth and faith. Both encyclicals present careful arguments against various theories that deny the availability or significance of truth as a norm for our reasoning and acting. In Veritatis Splendor, John Paul finds the roots of such phenomena as cultural relativism, distorted views of conscience, and the totalitarian potential of democratic politics in various sorts of failure to acknowledge that the truth about God and the human person is an internal element of freedom and not a threat to it. Likewise, in Fides et Ratio, John Paul focuses on the viability of the human search for truth and its expression in metaphysical inquiry and ecclesiastical proclamation. He criticizes versions of historicism, scientism, pragmatism, and nihilism as the results of a flight from the truth. But John Paul’s aims in these encyclicals go beyond these theoretical interventions. Together, these encyclicals constitute a kind of protreptic invitation to a way of life both philosophical and theological, both naturally human and fully Christian. They both begin, in their first chapters, by proposing the question of the meaning of life.1 This question emerges, in each case, out of a narrative context. In Veritatis Splendor, John Paul begins with the","PeriodicalId":40384,"journal":{"name":"Quaestiones Disputatae","volume":"228 1","pages":"3 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaestiones Disputatae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jnietstud.44.2.0139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This year marks the twentyfifth and twentieth anniversaries of two of Pope St. John Paul’s most important encyclicals. Promulgated in 1993, Veritatis Splendor sets out the principles of Catholic moral teaching and analyzes the dissent it has sometimes met; Fides et Ratio, written five years later, responds to certain errors with respect to the work of reason and its relation to faith, errors that underwrite a widespread lack of confidence in truth and a corruption of both philosophy itself and the attempts of plain persons to make sense of their own lives. John Paul himself draws the connection between these two encyclicals this way: “In . . . Veritatis Splendor . . . I draw attention to ‘certain fundamental truths of Catholic doctrine. . . .’ In the present letter, I wish to pursue that reflection by concentrating on the theme of truth itself and its foundation in relation to faith” (n. 6). These encyclicals, then, share a common emphasis on truth and faith. Both encyclicals present careful arguments against various theories that deny the availability or significance of truth as a norm for our reasoning and acting. In Veritatis Splendor, John Paul finds the roots of such phenomena as cultural relativism, distorted views of conscience, and the totalitarian potential of democratic politics in various sorts of failure to acknowledge that the truth about God and the human person is an internal element of freedom and not a threat to it. Likewise, in Fides et Ratio, John Paul focuses on the viability of the human search for truth and its expression in metaphysical inquiry and ecclesiastical proclamation. He criticizes versions of historicism, scientism, pragmatism, and nihilism as the results of a flight from the truth. But John Paul’s aims in these encyclicals go beyond these theoretical interventions. Together, these encyclicals constitute a kind of protreptic invitation to a way of life both philosophical and theological, both naturally human and fully Christian. They both begin, in their first chapters, by proposing the question of the meaning of life.1 This question emerges, in each case, out of a narrative context. In Veritatis Splendor, John Paul begins with the
编辑器的介绍
今年是教皇圣若望保禄最重要的两份通谕的25周年和20周年。1993年颁布的《光辉真理》阐明了天主教道德教育的原则,并分析了它有时遇到的异议;五年后写的《信仰与比例》回应了关于理性及其与信仰的关系的某些错误,这些错误导致了对真理的普遍缺乏信心,以及哲学本身和普通人试图理解自己生活的腐败。若望保禄二世自己是这样把这两封通谕联系起来的:“在……光辉真理…我提请大家注意“天主教教义的某些基本真理. . . .”,在这封通谕中,我希望通过专注于真理本身的主题,以及它与信仰的关系,来进行这种反思”(第6号)。因此,这些通谕都共同强调真理和信仰。这两份通谕都对各种否认真理作为我们推理和行动准则的可用性或重要性的理论进行了仔细的论证。在《真理的光辉》一书中,约翰·保罗二世发现了诸如文化相对主义、对良知的扭曲看法以及民主政治的极权主义潜力等现象的根源,这些根源在于各种各样的失败,即未能承认关于上帝和人类的真理是自由的内在因素,而不是对自由的威胁。同样,在《信仰与比例》一书中,若望保禄二世关注人类对真理的探索的可行性,以及它在形而上学探索和教会宣讲中的表达。他批评历史决定论、科学主义、实用主义和虚无主义都是逃避真理的结果。但若望保禄二世在这些通谕中的目的,超越了这些理论干预。总之,这些通谕构成了一种对哲学和神学、人性和完全基督徒生活方式的保护邀请。他们都在第一章中提出了生命意义的问题在每种情况下,这个问题都是在叙述背景下出现的。在《光辉真理》中,约翰·保罗二世以
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quaestiones Disputatae
Quaestiones Disputatae HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信